On 9/18/2021 10:08 AM, Joe Taylor via wsjt-devel wrote:
It turns out that Mike, W3IP, was using WSJT-X for FT8 with the
"Decode | Fast" setting.
With nearly any modern computer one should use "Decode | Deep" for
maximum FT8 sensitivity.
Was in the shack today, and checked WSJT-X setting and
Hi all,
In case you had wondered about the following post from K1HTV:
On 9/14/2021 1:55 PM, Rich - K1HTV via wsjt-devel wrote:
After this past weekend's ARRL VHF contest, one of the top SOHP scorers,
Mike, W3IP, posted a note to the PVRC reflector along with the breakdown
of his score. In his
then, like always -- use the right tool for the right job?
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:12 AM Jim Brown via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
> On 9/14/2021 11:43 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel wrote:
> > That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a
> >
On 9/14/2021 11:43 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA via wsjt-devel wrote:
That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a
greater number of decodes, but many were false decodes.
If I made the QSO and it shows up on LOTW, it wasn't a false decode!
And, BTW, WSJT-X is not without false
On 9/14/2021 10:55 AM, Rich - K1HTV via wsjt-devel wrote:
*"When operating on FT8, I ran WSJT-X and JTDX in parallel. The JTDX
decode capability on weak signals is significantly better - but JTDX
doesn't recognize contest mode. I had several contacts that decoded only
on JTDX so I had to
On 15/09/2021 4:27 pm, Saku via wsjt-devel wrote:
f wsjt-x decode is set to "Normal" or "Deep" I would rather say
"slightly better, in some cases".
That has been my experience as well. On the surface JTDX offers a
greater number of decodes, but many were false decodes.
If JTDX is truly
HI !
My opinion:
I have also tested this some time ago running both programs in parallel
with same linux PC, same rig IC7300, OCF dipole 80-10m.
If wsjt-x decode is set to "Normal" or "Deep" I would rather say
"slightly better, in some cases".
But difference is so small that it did not cause
After this past weekend's ARRL VHF contest, one of the top SOHP scorers,
Mike, W3IP, posted a note to the PVRC reflector along with the breakdown of
his score. In his comments he compared the FT8 sensitivity of WSJT-X vs
JTDX. Mike is a technically sharp guy and I trust what he has reported.
Here
-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Sunday, June 11, 2017 11:47 PM
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X vs JTDX
Michael, have you looked at the hint code that was added ... its a bunch of
'if then' decision trees, which can explain the 'extra processing'.
As a user, I'd rather trust the 13K WSJT-X d
Could you send me a randomly picked up subset of the JTDX exclusive decodes
together with a time stamp? I have a live data feed from pskreporter for a
visualization project and I can verify wether other stations received it and
what they were running.
I've got mostly solid data for the last
Title: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X vs JTDX
and there is another issue with those decoded 'very weak signals' on the HF bands!
In Europe we have different countries, different mentality, some like it soft,
some like it 'hot'...
The huge 'CALL3.TXT' file is an essential part of the hinted decode
Michael,
have you looked at the hint code that was added ... its a bunch of 'if
then' decision trees, which can explain the 'extra processing'.
As a user, I'd rather trust the 13K WSJT-X decodes to be REAL, rather
than the 15K of which 2 or 3K may be spurious.
Neil
KN3ILZ
On 6/11/2017
12 matches
Mail list logo
