Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes

2020-05-14 Thread Stephen Ireland
Bill, Ø Similarly a priori decoding based on the DX Call field are disabled by clearing the DX call field. If you are going to leave WSJT-X unattended then clearing the DX Call field is a good idea. Thanks for that. Noted. It is fully noted and makes sense. Some observations had occurred

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes

2020-05-14 Thread Bill Somerville
:* Thursday, 14 May 2020 11:47 PM *To:* WSJT software development *Subject:* [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes Folks, Reports are asked for ! Do NOT consider this a “knock” … it is just a report ! I am recording approximately 1 serious “false decode” every 12

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes

2020-05-14 Thread Stephen Ireland
development Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes Folks, Reports are asked for ! Do NOT consider this a “knock” … it is just a report ! I am recording approximately 1 serious “false decode” every 12 hours on average. Note that I am using “AP” mode

[wsjt-devel] WSJTX 2.2 RC1 - FT8 Intermittent/Irregular False Decodes

2020-05-14 Thread Stephen Ireland
Folks, Reports are asked for ! Do NOT consider this a “knock” … it is just a report ! I am recording approximately 1 serious “false decode” every 12 hours on average. Note that I am using “AP” mode: i.e. 200514_03203018.100 Tx FT8 0 0.0 700 CQ VK3VM QF11 200514_032045