Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Hi Joe, Bill, and all, I thought you’d be interested in seeing an encouraging result from our tests the other day. Hopefully, a screenshot will be attached to this, showing two receive cycles that I recorded while you both (Joe and Bill) were deliberately transmitting CQs on nearly the same fre

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

FWIW ... there has been at least >> 4 << different code releases today alone. I ran the JTSDK build at 3:00 EDT and built v7752. At 8:50 EDT or so, I built v7756. The updates are flying as fast as the development team can test and update. This is one of the reasons why the development team

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Hi Joe, That is a great approach. For some other products the developers seem to want the average user to debug the software for them, and they release multiple versions of their product over a very short period of time. The net result is there are a lot of very unstable products floating arou

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Hi Dani, Thanks for your comments. As far as I am concerned, a more important reason than possible licensing issues is the simple fact that when we deem a development version ready (or nearly ready) for general use, we post "official" installation packages. Until that time, we're in someth

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

El 30/06/17 a las 19:06, Joe Taylor escribió: > Anyone is welcome to build WSJT-X from source code, and use the results > on the air. But please DO NOT post your pre-built binaries for others > to download. This causes needless support problems for us. We have no > way of knowing exactly what y

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

s of doing it on their own. >> 73 Jay KA9CFD >> -Original Message- >> From: David Tiller [mailto:dtil...@captechconsulting.com] >> Sent: June 30, 2017 14:57 >> To: WSJT software development >> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes >> All, >> Since

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

own. 73 Jay KA9CFD -Original Message- From: David Tiller [mailto:dtil...@captechconsulting.com] Sent: June 30, 2017 14:57 To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes All, Since Joe mentioned revision 7754, I unofficially built it for OSX 10.9+ and uploaded it her

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

T software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes All, Since Joe mentioned revision 7754, I unofficially built it for OSX 10.9+ and uploaded it here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4DphHV_ItCZbjZDdmt2NnR2cHc If you're a macOS user, I'll try to keep recent builds in the same direc

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

All, Since Joe mentioned revision 7754, I unofficially built it for OSX 10.9+ and uploaded it here: https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4DphHV_ItCZbjZDdmt2NnR2cHc If you're a macOS user, I'll try to keep recent builds in the same directory (if that's ok w/ Joe, et al, re: unofficial builds). --

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Joe, OK. osd can only be successful if it is given candidates. I’m noticing now that the current sync threshold is high enough where bp probably doesn’t fail all that often. In any case, more candidates fed to osd would only increase the fraction of time spent in that routine. It doesn’t seem

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Hi Steve, Yes, 40 iterations for bp. With norder=2 hardwired for everything I still get 574 good decodes. So at least in jt9.exe, with no attempt to move nfqso around, using norder=3 produces no more decodes. Here are the timer results with norder=2: Name Time Frac dT

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

HI Joe & Steve, one quick win might be to implement a more CPU intensive decode at the Rx DF +/- a few Hertz when clicking the "Decode" button or double clicking the waterfall. I believe most of the logic to drive this is already in place. 73 Bill G4WJS. On 30/06/2017 15:34, Steven Franke w

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 notes

Joe, Were these results obtained with 40 iterations for bp and norder = 3 for signals at or within 10 Hz of nfqso? If so, it might be interesting to see how the numbers would change if you dropped back to norder=2 for all signals. Steve > On Jun 30, 2017, at 9:25 AM, Joe Taylor wrote: > > Hi

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Notes

One FT8 record in pskreporter (RA9HO heard by I3RGH). Hopefully the first of many! Congratulations. Philip On 29/06/2017 21:58, Tim Carlson wrote: I just made my first FT8 QSO with WB4KDI as well. I agree - very cool. -Tim - KD0GYG On Jun 29, 2017, at 6:43 PM, C. Gary Rogers

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Notes

I just made my first FT8 QSO with WB4KDI as well. I agree - very cool. -Tim - KD0GYG > On Jun 29, 2017, at 6:43 PM, C. Gary Rogers wrote: > > Just made first FT8 QSO with WB4KDI…Way cool!!!…73 Gary > >> On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Dave 'Doc' Corio > > wrote: >>

Re: [wsjt-devel] FT8 Notes

Just made first FT8 QSO with WB4KDI…Way cool!!!…73 Gary > On Jun 29, 2017, at 7:56 PM, Dave 'Doc' Corio wrote: > > Managed 5 or 6 QSOs with the new mode so far. Two things I notice: > > 1. Even when the cursor on the wide graph is directly on a FT8 signal it does > not decode to the receiv