Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

On 07/07/2017 14:43, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: For Bill The easy way to test functionality is to remove set_vfo from dummy.c in hamlib and test with that and rigctld. WSJT-X will fail. So it's just changing the set_vfo capability logic to match get the get_vfo logic. Bill's

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

2017 8:20 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 Mike -- Thanks for submitting the patches!  I have installed "menu.patch" and "qsotime.patch".  They appear to be OK, but please double-check to be sure their functions are what's wanted. I have left

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

des. de Mike W9MDB *From:* Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> *To:* wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net *Sent:* Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:12 AM *Subject:* Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

On 07/07/2017 07:58, Adrian Fabry wrote: 2. For the saved wav files, mode and submode should be included in the file name Hi Ady, more information is included in the catalogue of the WAV files. It can be examined using a tool like Audacity to look at the metadata. It is unfortunate that the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Hi Joe, thank you and all the development team for the work. I'd suggest two features: 1. QRA64: Different color (or using bold chars) for the AP part of the decoded message, when AP was used in the decode. 2. For the saved wav files, mode and submode should be included in the file name 73

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

, July 6, 2017 11:12 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: I've got 3 patches outstanding #1 Menu controls working when controls are hidden + CTRL-E/Shift-E shortcuts for enabling/disabling Tx even/1st

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Thank you, Michael. I’ve been confused as to the function of the slider - it never seemed to do anything for me because I’ve always left Flatten checked. It seems like education is needed in either case (leaving it on the main window, or moving it to the waterfall window). In that case, it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

mdblac...@yahoo.com>; WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 3:20 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 Thank you, Michael.  I’ve been confused as to the function of the slider - it never seemed to do

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Hi Al, On 7/6/2017 3:59 PM, CX8AT VERA wrote: Maybe I missed something when reading this group's mail, but something that I don't like is to have 2 windows (main window and wide graph) apart, is hard for me to keep both with the right size in a small wide 13" notebook, It is possible to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

and Wide graph, though if Flatten is checked on the Widegraph than the slider control is not effective. de Mike W9MDB From: Bill Somerville <g4...@classdesign.com> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:49 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Hi Joe Maybe I missed something when reading this group's mail, but something that I don't like is to have 2 windows (main window and wide graph) apart, is hard for me to keep both with the right size in a small wide 13" notebook, It is possible to have both just in one windows? this maybe

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

On 06/07/2017 20:43, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: This was discussed a while ago and those users who were using the FastGraph wanted to keep the control on the main window. So...preferring usability over confusion was the result and it was decided to keep it on the main window. It

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 2:28 PM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 About the former “digital gain” slider - yes, I agree it’s time to move it out of the main window. If the functionality is retained in the fast and slow graphs, then it

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

About the former “digital gain” slider - yes, I agree it’s time to move it out of the main window. If the functionality is retained in the fast and slow graphs, then it can be eliminated entirely. We might want to consider unifying the waterfall controls in a pop up that can be hidden once

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

> On Jul 6, 2017, at 10:07 AM, Black Michael via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > We talked about removing the slider and putting it on the waterfall but some > wanted it to remain on the main screen. Commenting ONLY on this part of it, the slider does seem a bit

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

, July 06, 2017 11:08 AM To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Cc: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 What change? The meter shows the recording level now instead of the waterfall level. The sli

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

ngfamily.free-online.co.uk> To: Black Michael <mdblac...@yahoo.com>; WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:19 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 Mike The change that disconnected the thermomet

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

From: Steven Franke <s.j.fra...@icloud.com> To: Joe Taylor <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 10:57 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1 The following come to mind: - Phase and amplitude equalization for MSK144. (We/I need to

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

; > From: "char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk" > <char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk> > To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:00 AM > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

On 06/07/2017 17:00, Black Michael via wsjt-devel wrote: I've got 3 patches outstanding #1 Menu controls working when controls are hidden + CTRL-E/Shift-E shortcuts for enabling/disabling Tx even/1st #2 Fix rigctld aborting on rigs without set_vfo (e.g. FT-891/991) #3 Fix QSO start times for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

W9MDB From: "char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk" <char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk> To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> Sent: Thursday, July 6, 2017 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

I've got 3 patches outstanding #1 Menu controls working when controls are hidden + CTRL-E/Shift-E shortcuts for enabling/disabling Tx even/1st#2 Fix rigctld aborting on rigs without set_vfo (e.g. FT-891/991)#3 Fix QSO start times for double-click progression and autoseq modes Here they are:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

Hi Joe Perhaps worth mentioning the change to the audio level setting to avoid inadvertent clipping - folks now have to adjust soundcard level controls, radio level or external 'attenuator'. Charlie > Hi all, > > I'm compiling a list of important new features and other changes that > will be

Re: [wsjt-devel] Preparation for WSJT-X v1.8.0-rc1

The following come to mind: - Phase and amplitude equalization for MSK144. (We/I need to fix the refspec part of this, and also write up some docs) - SWL mode for MSK144 allows third-party monitoring Sh-message QSOs. - Enhanced frequency management scheme (Bill should contribute the proper