Hello!
Commenting contribution by Take, Igor etc:
Instead of overcomplicating protocols, diversity reception shall be considered.
Instead of variable bit rate, we can get up to 5 dB by combining repeated
frames.
We can often see several repetitions of same frame. Each repetition has
When I am sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my
laptop using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there,
anything that relies on the Internet will be basically useless to me. Why
would we aim to exclude a growing number of such users like me? Perhaps
On 9/1/2018 3:14 AM, Iztok Saje wrote:
Instead of overcomplicating protocols, diversity reception shall be
considered.
Diversity reception has been around for nearly a century, and depends on
the very complex computing engine located between the ears of the
operator. My guess is that any
Hi all,
On 9/1/2018 1:58 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 9/1/2018 3:14 AM, Iztok Saje wrote:
Instead of overcomplicating protocols, diversity reception shall be
considered.
Diversity reception has been around for nearly a century, and depends on
the very complex computing engine located between the
On 9/1/2018 11:26 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
It's worth mentioning that for more than a decade MAP65, a sister
program of WSJT, WSPR, and WSJT-X, has provided a powerful and uniquely
effective form of diversity reception: polarization diversity. And yes,
the outputs of two receivers ARE simply be
> Most applications of diversity reception are on the MF and low HF bands. I
> believe that most fading on these bands is selective fading, where signals
> traveling slightly different paths, the low-frequency equivalent of
> picket-fencing at VHF/UHF. It might be worth studying propagation on the
Hi, I will make another noise from the floor as Iztok wrote as follows,
“Commenting contribution by Take, Igor etc:”
Two topics, hashing and diversity technologies has been repeatedly on the
topics from the readers of this mailing list in the past and are willing to
adopt by the development
Hi all,
I was looking in the 1.9.1 user guide for an explanation of why using
the 'Hold Tx Freq' should be checked, when I noticed that its not
mentioned, but the old 'Lock Tx=Rx" option is!
Obviously this was overlooked by everyone, and should be updated for v2.0.
73,
Neil, KN3ILZ
---
Hi Jim --
On 9/1/2018 5:31 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
On 9/1/2018 11:26 AM, Joe Taylor wrote:
It's worth mentioning that for more than a decade MAP65, a sister
program of WSJT, WSPR, and WSJT-X, has provided a powerful and
uniquely effective form of diversity reception: polarization
diversity.
