When I am sitting in a park or out on a snowmobile trail with my KX3 and my 
laptop using a GPS for time sync since there’s no cell reception there, 
anything that relies on the Internet will be basically useless to me.  Why 
would we aim to exclude a growing number of such users like me?  Perhaps I’m 
misunderstanding.  

 

Jim S. 

N2ADV

 

From: Игорь Ч via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net] 
Sent: Friday, August 31, 2018 6:33 PM
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Cc: Игорь Ч
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 2.0 possible new mode/protocol

 

Hello Joe,
.
It was excellent example with the WSPR QSO, just thought we can get additional 
FT8 gain if some messages at QSO will be transmitted as 'hash hash' / 'call 
hash' / 'hash call'   instead of callsigns.
.
Yes, there is a trade off between the sensitivity and protocol flexibility. 
Probably we can add more flexibility if some information will be passed over 
Internet, for instance free text messages and GRID, it will spare more bits 
toward sensitivity on the radio interface.
.
Other option is to pass some message's hash over Internet while transmitting 
this message via radio interface, it will also spare some bits toward 
sensitivity.
.
Proposed by Take JA5AEA variable code rate: we can pass information on the code 
rate over Internet at the QSO, hence appropriate decoder can be used per each 
message. The same approach can be implemented with the variable protocol where 
protocol details, for instance i3bit, can be broadcasted over Internet.
.
Leaving callsigns(hash) and report to the radio interface and combining radio 
interface messages and traffic over Internet in the FT8+ protocol we can marry 
JT65/JT9 sensitivity and FT8 rate of QSO.
.
I do not believe any new mode outside WSJT-X is a good idea, it would be more 
efficient to keep going in the common direction.
.
73 Igor UA3DJY

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Check out the vibrant tech community on one of the world's most
engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to