Re: [wsjt-devel] [UPDATE] - Migration from AsciiDoc to Asciidoctor -Approved

Hi Bill and Greg, Thanks for looking into the font-rendering issue I raised. > https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4192709/wsjtx-main.html With default settings my browsers display your html file very nicely. I'd say the 90% setting is an improvement. To my eyes, the pdf file you posted here

[wsjt-devel] wspr-15

Hi all I was asked by a friend who uses wspr-15 on LF about wsjtx I see on the menu its greyed out, what the position on this mode ? is it work in progress or have I missed a s/w switch for it ? Thanks -- -- Best wishes /73 Richard Bown Email : rich...@g8jvm.com HTTP : http://www.g8jvm.com

Re: [wsjt-devel] [UPDATE] - Migration from AsciiDoc to Asciidoctor -Approved

On 19/11/2015 22:07, Greg Beam wrote: > If we're not going to ship a PDF with the package, Asccidoctor has a > module that can be installed via gem to generate PDF's. It's > implementation is not 100% yet, but it's working for v1.7.0. This > "should" also work for the v1.6.0-RC version. > > To

[wsjt-devel] timecmd error on comma

Hi All, only for information. Script C:\JTSDK\scripts\timecmd.cmd give me errors so a write a small c program. Analyzing it I found the problem. Simply on my PC echo %time% give 11:13:35,12 (note the comma) Changing set options="tokens=1-4 delims=:." to set options="tokens=1-4 delims=:.," the

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.6 rc Hamlib3 Question

On 19/11/2015 23:47, Jim Bennett wrote: Hi - I downloaded and installed v 1.6 RC1 from Joe's site. Got the installation done on Ubuntu Linux v14.0 with a little (OK, a lot) of help from Greg KI7MT. My radio is a SoftRock Ensemble RXTX. If I select Softrock from the drop down list of radios it

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: *Important* - please read if you build WSJT-X from source

Hi Bill and Greg from tread I understand that if there is no local modifications simply remove source and build directories. Start from zero by script. I do that from QT55 and compiling wsjtx rc2 and develop. I obtain the errors that Bill have solved in September 2014 with tune button, split

Re: [wsjt-devel] wspr-15

On Fri, 20 Nov 2015 11:52:10 -0500 Joe Taylor wrote: > Up to now WSPR-15 has not been implemented in any version of WSJT-X. If > there is sufficient interest, this capability could be added to some > future release. > > -- Joe, K1JT Hi Joe apparently its quite

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: *Important* - please read if you build WSJT-X from source

On 20/11/2015 16:50, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > from tread I understand that if there is no local modifications simply > remove source and build directories. Hi Sandro, yes that is fine if a little slower. 73 Bill G4WJS.

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: *Important* - please read if you build WSJT-X from source

On 20/11/2015 16:50, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > I do that from QT55 and compiling wsjtx rc2 and develop. > I obtain the errors that Bill have solved in September 2014 with tune > button, split etc. > ERR--> Rig split mode setting not consistent with WSJT-X settings. > > With with qt55-disable

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0-devel r6131

On 20/11/2015 17:39, Cedric wrote: > I just got a -29dB JT65 decode. I wonder if it's really possible? Hi Cedric, it is certainly possible although the development branch contains a lot of new code in this area and it is quite possible that the SNR figure from the deepest JT65 decodes is not

[wsjt-devel] Mode display on WSJT-X 1.6.1 r6010

Hi All I have been using Echo mode this evening, switching between JT4 and Echo and notice that mode displayed on bottom of Main window shows last set JT4 mode, not Echo when Echo is selected. Same observation if program is closed from Echo and restarted (ie mode shown as JT4x). 73 Charlie

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.6 rc Hamlib3 Question

Michael, Here is that output report: w6jhb@ubuntu:~$ rigctl -v -m 2509 rigctl, Hamlib 1.2.15.3 Report bugs to rig:rig_init called rig: loading backend kit kit: _init called rig_register (2501) rig_register (2502) rig_register (2506) rig_register

Re: [wsjt-devel] [UPDATE] - Migration from AsciiDoc to Asciidoctor -Approved

Hi Bill, See below. On 11/20/2015 05:55 AM, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 19/11/2015 22:07, Greg Beam wrote: >> If we're not going to ship a PDF with the package, Asccidoctor has a >> module that can be installed via gem to generate PDF's. It's >> implementation is not 100% yet, but it's working

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.6 rc Hamlib3 Question

On 20/11/2015 17:06, Jim Bennett wrote: > Here is that output report: > > w6jhb@ubuntu:~$ rigctl -v -m 2509 > rigctl, Hamlib 1.2.15.3 ... > si570xxxusb_open called > si570xxxusb_open: detected PE0FKO-like firmware > si570xxxusb_open: using Xtall at 114.278 MHz > Opened rig model 2509, 'Si570

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0-devel r6131

Well hopefully they aren't political numbers :-) Here's a plot of the db levels I've seen for JT65. This is 1M rows from my ALL.TXT and you can see the apparent improvements lately with the larger group of -26, -27 and -28 decodes.And there are a few -30 decodes too. But only 1 before just

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0-devel r6131

Any measurement has an associated uncertainty. More precisely, for any measurement there is a probability distribution of "true" values that might have given rise to the measured value. Seeing an occasional measured value of -29 dB is nothing to be concerned about. -- Joe On

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0-devel r6131

I just got a -29dB JT65 decode. I wonder if it's really possible? 73, Cedric HB9HFN -- ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

Re: [wsjt-devel] timecmd error on comma

Hi Sandro, Thanks for the catch. This is added to SVN and will make it into the next update. 73's Greg, KI On 11/20/2015 03:19 AM, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > Hi All, > > only for information. > > Script C:\JTSDK\scripts\timecmd.cmd give me errors so a write a small c > program. > Analyzing

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65A Decoding Comparison

Hi Steve and all, I've added what I hope is a reasonable EME fading model to the simulated data files produced by jt65sim. The fading characteristic is defined by a specified amount of "Doppler spread" (in Hz) applied to the simulated signal. Typical Doppler spreads on popular EME bands are

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65A Decoding Comparison

Hi Rex, Thanks for the reminders! Your item 6 is included in my item 3 ("Optimizations of submodes B and C). I agree that the degradation facility can be useful; I'll put that on the list. Also maybe JT65D (and even JT65E?) ? I'll think more about these. -- Joe On 11/20/2015 2:57

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65A Decoding Comparison

Hi Joe If you can fit them in while you are doing it can you: 6. Add variable bin-width decoding to JT65a, b and c like on JT4 7. Add JT65d and possibly JT65e 8. The degradation decoding facility in WSJT10 which is useful to establish how much we have in reserve. I think these will be very

Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65A Decoding Comparison

Hi Joe I guess the issue with JT65E is whether it is better to focus small station to small station EME at 10 and 24 GHz on wide bin-width JT9, also with variable bin-width decoding. JT9 will allow wider spreading with standard SSB pass bands. JT9 should be better for single line decodes with

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0 dev

Hi Bill.thanks ...i thought as much...the new decoder works well here will keep trialling it. 73David VK4BDJ On 21/11/15 07:18, Bill Somerville wrote: > On 20/11/2015 21:15, David wrote: >> does the WSJT-X 1.7.0-devlop v 1641 use kvasd or the newer decoder >> that has been worked on for a

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0 dev

On 20/11/2015 21:15, David wrote: > does the WSJT-X 1.7.0-devlop v 1641 use kvasd or the newer decoder > that has been worked on for a while Hi David, the development branch no longer references KVASD. 73 Bill G4WJS. --

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0 dev

Hidoes the WSJT-X 1.7.0-devlop v 1641 use kvasd or the newer decoder that has been worked on for a while..as im using a vertical and signals are fairly weak here if the new decoder is being used it will give me some comparison to work by -- 73 David VK4BDJ

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X 1.7.0 dev

FWIW: I don't have / use anything other than verticals, or simple wire dipoles, I never have done (ever). It's not easy working big pile-ups like the current S79 or VK9 dxe's, but I get there in the end. The new decoder in v1.7.0 is working FB for me here in MT. 73's Greg, KI7MT On

[wsjt-devel] wsjtx 1.6.0rc1

After installing rc1 on my Windows 7 box, I find that it will not talk to HDSDR via hamlib 3.0 -- hamlib times out. Any special secrets to resolve this? -- P.J. "Josh" Rovero http://www.roveroresearch.org Ham Radio: KK1D http://www.roveroresearch. net

Re: [wsjt-devel] wsjtx 1.6.0rc1

On 20/11/2015 23:54, Josh Rovero wrote: After installing rc1 on my Windows 7 box, I find that it will not talk to HDSDR via hamlib 3.0 -- hamlib times out. Any special secrets to resolve this? -- P.J. "Josh" Rovero http://www.roveroresearch.org Ham Radio: KK1D http://www.roveroresearch.

Re: [wsjt-devel] [UPDATE] - Migration from AsciiDoc to Asciidoctor -Approved

On 20/11/2015 15:17, Joe Taylor wrote: Hi Joe, ... > >> https://dl.dropboxusercontent.com/u/4192709/wsjtx-main.html > With default settings my browsers display your html file very nicely. > I'd say the 90% setting is an improvement. OK, I will commit that change. > > To my eyes, the pdf file you