Hi Joe I guess the issue with JT65E is whether it is better to focus small station to small station EME at 10 and 24 GHz on wide bin-width JT9, also with variable bin-width decoding. JT9 will allow wider spreading with standard SSB pass bands. JT9 should be better for single line decodes with more energy on the message but probably not useful for averaging. However, with QSB there might be little in it either way and a focus on JT9 might be the best way to go for all microwave EME.
Rex -----Original Message----- From: Joe Taylor [mailto:[email protected]] Sent: Saturday, 21 November 2015 7:45 AM To: WSJT software development Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] JT65A Decoding Comparison Hi Rex, Thanks for the reminders! Your item 6 is included in my item 3 ("Optimizations of submodes B and C). I agree that the degradation facility can be useful; I'll put that on the list. Also maybe JT65D (and even JT65E?) ? I'll think more about these. -- Joe ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
