Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:13:49 + Bill Somerville wrote: > On 29/12/2015 14:00, Richard Bown wrote: > > Just the audio card to sort out, if Hardkernel don't produce an audio > > card,can a USB audio card > > be recommended that wont break the bank ??? > > Hi Richard, >

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X fortran runtime error

2015-12-29 Thread Alessandro Gorobey
Hi All, For my forgetfulness I left the radio on with the program running on 20 meters until late evening. I found on screen a "Fortran run time error: index '51' of dimension 1 of array 'dec' above upper bound of 50" in Windows, "decode" button fixed light blue. WSJT-X save some files after

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X fortran runtime error

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 16:32, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > I found on screen a "Fortran run time error: index '51' of dimension 1 > of array 'dec' above upper bound of 50" in Windows, "decode" button > fixed light blue. Hi Sandro, in "Settings->Advanced" you probably have "Aggressive decoding level"

[wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X fortran runtime error

2015-12-29 Thread Alessandro Gorobey
Hi Bill, Aggressive decoding is zero, as default. I try a lot before write, and without a ini file (removed in every round) it is zero. I have to remove "Two pass decodings" to not hangup program, but seem that is not the target. In windows I have some results. My linux as bigger video and is

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Source file name changes

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 21:36, Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi Joe, Steve & all, > > I am about to make a checkin that retires the following files: > > lib/jt4a.f90 > lib/wsjt4.f90 > lib/avg4.f90 > lib/jt65a.f90 > lib/decjt9.f90 > > Their contents will be migrated into the following source files: > >

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Source file name changes

2015-12-29 Thread Steven Franke
Bill - OK with me if you go ahead. I am working in other areas, trying to sort out why I am not able to reproduce the kvasd error rate plots that I made a couple of days ago... Steve k9an > On Dec 29, 2015, at 3:36 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > > Hi Joe, Steve & all, >

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Source file name changes

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Joe, Steve & all, I am about to make a checkin that retires the following files: lib/jt4a.f90 lib/wsjt4.f90 lib/avg4.f90 lib/jt65a.f90 lib/decjt9.f90 Their contents will be migrated into the following source files: lib/jt4_decode.f90 lib/jt65_decode.f90 lib/jt9_decode.f90 because of this

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Source file name changes

2015-12-29 Thread Joe Taylor
Hi Bill, I can work around any conflicts. As far as I'm concerned, you can go ahead and commit. Looks like I won't have the JT4 test files ready until tomorrow. -- Joe On 12/29/2015 4:36 PM, Bill Somerville wrote: > Hi Joe, Steve& all, > > I am about to make a checkin that retires

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X: Source file name changes

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
Hi Joe, On 29/12/2015 22:02, Joe Taylor wrote: > I can work around any conflicts. As far as I'm concerned, you can go > ahead and commit. OK, I am rearranging my commit a little so that the following should be tracked as file renames: lib/jt65a.f90 -> lib/jt65_decode.f90 lib/decjt9.f90 ->

Re: [wsjt-devel] Fwd: Re: WSJT-X fortran runtime error

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 17:37, Alessandro Gorobey wrote: > Aggressive decoding is zero, as default. > I try a lot before write, and without a ini file (removed in every > round) it is zero. > > I have to remove "Two pass decodings" to not hangup program, but seem > that is not the target. > > In windows I

Re: [wsjt-devel] jtsdk win32 update 4

2015-12-29 Thread Alessandro Gorobey
Hi Greg, with 2.0.3-565 all OK Thanks and Happy new Year 73 Sandro IW3RAB -- ___ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net

[wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
Hi All and a happy new year for Thursday Is anyone running either WSJTX or WSJT10 on an ODROID XU4 SBC, which is a 2x quadcore ( octal core) SBC. It should have enough grunt to run either, but I'm not sure of the state of QT5 on ubuntu armhf The one concern I have is it uses eMMC flash for

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:32:58 -0700 Greg Beam wrote: > Hi Bill, Richard, > > At present, ARMv7 builds have to be specifically enabled per package by > the Launchpad administrators. All of the WSJT-X packages I have on > Launchpad are ARMv7 build enabled (current 1.6.0 GA

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 14:00, Richard Bown wrote: > Just the audio card to sort out, if Hardkernel don't produce an audio > card,can a USB audio card be > recommended that wont break the bank ??? Hi Richard, most cheap USB audio devices work well enough. They should support 48kHz sample rates for

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 12:21, Richard Bown wrote: > My main use is MS FSK441 Hi Richard, I do not think we are doing official Ubuntu ARM WSJT-X package builds yet but there's no reason I know of that would preclude using WSJT-X on that platform. There are certainly RasPi2 users and that runs WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Greg Beam
Hi Bill, Richard, At present, ARMv7 builds have to be specifically enabled per package by the Launchpad administrators. All of the WSJT-X packages I have on Launchpad are ARMv7 build enabled (current 1.6.0 GA Release, and v1.7.0 Testing version). As fare as I am aware, there's no reason WSJT