Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On 15/01/2016 12:31, Paul wrote: > Can any one tell me if the IQ software will be added to wsjtx. Hi Paul, it is not currently being worked on. In general there are two related issues with using IQ data, firstly it has to be "demodulated" and secondly the mode and frequency of demodulation

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On 15/01/16 12:42, Bill Somerville wrote: > I suggest that you investigate using HDSDR or similar as an intermediary > between the receiver (and transmitter) and WSJT-X Paul I use dttsp/sdr-shell/jack running on Mint linux for this purpose. It works well. 73 Nick G3VNC

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:46:44 -0200 "Edson W. R. Pereira" wrote: > Hi Richard, > > Ok! My apologies. I must have misunderstood what you wrote. > > 73, Edson PY2SDR > > HI Edson I tried to simplify it as much as possible, may be too much, but I was under the impression

[wsjt-devel] Raspberry Pi

Thanks for your comments and suggestions. I agree that a complex detector is not needed to decode signals from a Softrock and I have been able to decode JT65 and JT9 signals using wsjtx on both my RPi 2 and windows. The RPi 2 version of wsjtx I use was via a direct download. I did not

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

Hi Richard, Ok! My apologies. I must have misunderstood what you wrote. 73, Edson PY2SDR --- - We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together. - Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se trabalharmos juntos. On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:39 PM,

Re: [wsjt-devel] possible defect in the FFT code

Igor -- Please feel free to tune the WSJT-X decoders in any way you see fit, and to use external bandpass filters on the data as you wish. One of the benefits of open-source code is that you can modify it as you desire. If you come up with code you believe is superior, I'm sure you will let

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:42:35 + Bill Somerville wrote: > On 15/01/2016 12:31, Paul wrote: > > Can any one tell me if the IQ software will be added to wsjtx. > Hi Paul, > > it is not currently being worked on. In general there are two related > issues with using IQ

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:32:35 + nick wrote: > On 15/01/16 12:42, Bill Somerville wrote: > > I suggest that you investigate using HDSDR or similar as an intermediary > > between the receiver (and transmitter) and WSJT-X > > Paul > > I use dttsp/sdr-shell/jack running on Mint

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

Hello Nick, I am glad to see that sdr-shell is still useful and is still being used ten years after I first released it. 73, Edson PY2SDR --- - We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together. - Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:23:48 -0200 "Edson W. R. Pereira" wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Richard Bown wrote: > > > > > You can feed a SDR with just an single audio feed and you will see the > > local ocillator and a > > positive spectrum on

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Richard Bown wrote: > > You can feed a SDR with just an single audio feed and you will see the > local ocillator and a > positive spectrum on the right and a negative on the left, using a I > input allows you to remove > the unwanted sideband

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry Pi

On 15/01/2016 17:53, Paul wrote: > C++ internal compiler error, immediately after Building CXX object ... > /echograph.cpp.o Compiler ICE messages are sometimes due to resource limitations. If you are using a parallel build (-j) then try without it. Try increasing the process virtual memory

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry Pi

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:53:37 - "Paul" wrote: > Thanks for your comments and suggestions. > > I agree that a complex detector is not needed to decode signals from a > Softrock and I have been > able to decode JT65 and JT9 signals using wsjtx on both my RPi 2

Re: [wsjt-devel] Raspberry PI

On 15/01/16 14:41, Richard Bown wrote: > core to shell are usable with a network > connection between. there is a separate yahoo group for this I did not know that. What is the group name please Richard? 73 Nick G3VNC

Re: [wsjt-devel] sdr-shell

On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 20:10:10 + nick wrote: > On 15/01/16 14:56, Edson W. R. Pereira wrote: > > I am glad to see that sdr-shell is still useful and is still being used ten > > years after I first released it. > > Hi Edson > > Firstly, a big thank you for all your hard work on

[wsjt-devel] sdr-shell

On 15/01/16 14:56, Edson W. R. Pereira wrote: > I am glad to see that sdr-shell is still useful and is still being used ten > years after I first released it. Hi Edson Firstly, a big thank you for all your hard work on sdr-shell. It has proved invaluable here in this non-Windows environment

[wsjt-devel] Test wav files

Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be available along with test scripts? Back when testing was being done during the improvements there were several hundred files being used but I can't find any reference/link for them. RRR Mike W9MDB

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test wav files

On 15/01/2016 21:45, Michael Black wrote: > Do we have a link where some of the test files used previously might be > available along with test scripts? Hi Mike, developers tend to accumulate their own test files. If you say which mode and band you are interested in maybe someone can make theirs

Re: [wsjt-devel] Test wav files

Mike -- Whatever tests you might choose to do would have more value if they were your own -- i.e., independent of tests already done by others. If you want representative JT9 and JT65 data, set up in dual mode on 14.076, on a weekend in daytime, check "Save all", and let it run for all day.