Re: [wsjt-devel] Widegraph behaviour

Thanks, Joe Will pass that on. Charlie > This has always been the case, and it's for good reasons. > > -- Joe, K1JT > > On 3/30/2018 1:10 PM, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote: >> Hi All >> >> I just had a comment from a user not on this list that when stretching >> or >>

Re: [wsjt-devel] Widegraph behaviour

This has always been the case, and it's for good reasons. -- Joe, K1JT On 3/30/2018 1:10 PM, char...@sucklingfamily.free-online.co.uk wrote: Hi All I just had a comment from a user not on this list that when stretching or resizing widegraph the data already written to it is lost. I

[wsjt-devel] Widegraph behaviour

Hi All I just had a comment from a user not on this list that when stretching or resizing widegraph the data already written to it is lost. I can't recall whether this has always been the case or is the result of a recent change. 73 Charlie G3WDG

Re: [wsjt-devel] 1.90-rc2 issue

Thank you Bill. That makes sense. I read the manual cover to cover, but I didn’t correlate everything for AP. I will read it again, more closely. I was a CIO/CSO for many years, specializing in DoD security and encryption. I’m fascinated by FT8. Thank you and the team for the responses.

Re: [wsjt-devel] 1.90-rc2 issue

On 30/03/2018 15:44, Gene Marsh wrote: At first, I thought someone was pranking me. Then, I saw it BEFORE I had transmitted. In my example, I had not been on for 3 days. I work FT8 approximately 10 hours a week, and approximately 10 hours of standing by on the program and radio. In that

Re: [wsjt-devel] 1.90-rc2 issue

False decode.  The selection of decode depth determines how many false postives you may see and with AP mode (a priori) adding quite a few more. de Mike W9MDB On Friday, March 30, 2018, 9:47:38 AM CDT, Gene Marsh wrote: First, awesome program. Thank you. Attached

[wsjt-devel] 1.90-rc2 issue

First, awesome program. Thank you. Attached you will see one example the issue. Environment: Win7 Pro Svc Pack 1 - 32bit Intel Pentuim M 2.00GHz 1.50GB RAM At first, I thought someone was pranking me. Then, I saw it BEFORE I had transmitted. In my example, I had not been on for 3 days. I

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

Hi Richard G4DYA, Thank you for providing the information as “1800-1810 KHz is allocated to the radiolocation service om ITU Region 1”. Now, I checked ITU RR and confirmed “Region 1” is allocated to solely “RADIOLOCATION” and “AMATEUR” is not allocated. Does this mean that co-sharing is

Re: [wsjt-devel] Premature use of FT8 DXpedition Mode

On 30/03/2018 12:34, Bill Somerville wrote: The only one that is even closely related is a fox of a defect that stopped the "Tune" button working for Hounds when the "DX Call" entry is blank, the work-around is obvious. I have no idea how that sentence came about, I meant to type: The only

Re: [wsjt-devel] Premature use of FT8 DXpedition Mode

On 30/03/2018 08:04, Saku wrote: Hi ! Do we get 1.9.0-rc4 for the next test, or should latest r to be compiled from source and used (if possible)? Question is because lot of rc3 bugs are known and perhaps we should step forward to see the effect of fixes and find new (lately added!!??)

Re: [wsjt-devel] Logging Issue

Thanks, Joe...r8591 fixed this little "glitch". Ed, K0KC k0kc@arrl.nethttp://k0kc.us/ On Thursday, March 29, 2018, 10:47:03 AM EDT, Ed Wilson via wsjt-devel wrote: I reverted back to r8576 and this anomaly did not appear. Ed, K0KC

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

On 30/03/18 08:50, Tsutsumi Takehiko wrote: > I with to hear comment about my suggestion to explore new harmonized spectrum > of narrow band digital on 160m at 1800-1810KHz, where IARU Region II table > has already allocated to narrow band digital. I believe this spectrum was > used for

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-X v1.9.0-rc3: Testing of FT8 DXpedition Mode

Hi again, I with to hear comment about my suggestion to explore new harmonized spectrum of narrow band digital on 160m at 1800-1810KHz, where IARU Region II table has already allocated to narrow band digital. I believe this spectrum was used for LORAN-A

Re: [wsjt-devel] Premature use of FT8 DXpedition Mode

Hi ! Do we get 1.9.0-rc4 for the next test, or should latest r to be compiled from source and used (if possible)? Question is because lot of rc3 bugs are known and perhaps we should step forward to see the effect of fixes and find new (lately added!!??) bugs. -- Saku OH1KH Joe Taylor