Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel
Hi Dennis, There may be something to improve in the hash table(s) management as in your example the first message CQ PJ5/SP9FIH was sent in full (it is a non-standard call, but that should not matter). Why the 10 bits hash was not updated into the hash table, but there is DP1POL instead for

Re: [wsjt-devel] Response to CQ ignored

2024-01-29 Thread Virginia Greene via wsjt-devel
I’ve had the exact same problem. No rhyme nor reason when it happens, either. 73, Clarke K1JX > On Jan 29, 2024, at 9:15 PM, Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hi Sam, > > Take a look at the screenshot, please. The “CQ First” option is selected. > > 73, Ed > > > >> On Jan 29,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Response to CQ ignored

2024-01-29 Thread Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel
Hi Sam, Take a look at the screenshot, please. The “CQ First” option is selected. 73, Ed > On Jan 29, 2024, at 6:05 PM, Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hi Ed, > > Make sure you have the right option selected "CQ:First" > > 73, > > Sam W2JDB > > > > On Monday, January 29, 2024

Re: [wsjt-devel] Response to CQ ignored

2024-01-29 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Hi Ed, Make sure you have the right option selected  "CQ:First" 73, Sam W2JDB On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 07:02:21 PM EST, Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel wrote: I see this over and over…. Is it me or is this a bug? I call CQ and someone responds.  But WSJT does not answer the

Re: [wsjt-devel] Response to CQ ignored

2024-01-29 Thread Sam W2JDB via wsjt-devel
Hi Ed, Make sure you have the right option selected  "CQ:First" 73, Sam W2JDB On Monday, January 29, 2024 at 07:02:21 PM EST, Ed Stokes via wsjt-devel wrote: I see this over and over…. Is it me or is this a bug? I call CQ and someone responds.  But WSJT does not answer the caller. 

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel
Thanks, what would be special about PJ5/SP9FIH in this case? I have not seen this with others using “portable designators.” --Dennis NE6I From: Jim Reisert AD1C via wsjt-devel Sent: Monday, January 29, 2024 3:09 PM To: WSJT software development Cc: Jim Reisert AD1C Subject: Re:

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Fred Price via wsjt-devel
Hash code clash most likely. Plus he’s using MSHV multi stream and not F/H because he’s using normal FT8 frequencies. Fred N2XK > On Jan 29, 2024, at 5:37 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Wondering if anyone else is seeing this issue. PJ5/SP9FIH is operating F/H. > When

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Jim Reisert AD1C via wsjt-devel
It's a callsign hash collision. DP1POL has not been operating on those frequencies. On Mon, Jan 29, 2024 at 4:07 PM V. Scott Moore via wsjt-devel < wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: > I saw similar decodes. I attributed it to two stations on the same > frequency. The PJ5 was very

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread V. Scott Moore via wsjt-devel
I saw similar decodes. I attributed it to two stations on the same frequency. The PJ5 was very strong here and when multi-streaming his/her signal came down and revealed the less powerful (but still +10 here) Antarctic station. scott W1SSN > On Jan 29, 2024, at 17:47, Carl Moreschi via

Re: [wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Carl Moreschi via wsjt-devel
I just saw exactly the same things on 17 meters. Carl Moreschi N4PY 127 River Moss Way Hertford, NC 27944 www.n4py.com On 1/29/2024 5:31 PM, Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel wrote: Wondering if anyone else is seeing this issue. PJ5/SP9FIH is operating F/H. When he is transmitting one

[wsjt-devel] Decoding Anomaly

2024-01-29 Thread Dennis Younker NE6I via wsjt-devel
Wondering if anyone else is seeing this issue. PJ5/SP9FIH is operating F/H. When he is transmitting one stream, his call is displayed correctly in the Rx Frequency window. When he transmits two streams, the call sign DP1POL is displayed instead. See below for an example. --Dennis NE6I 222830

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling Disable

2024-01-29 Thread Adrian via wsjt-devel
I went back to windows and using DXlab Commander as radio interface have everything ok now. Rigsplit etc, and no frequency mess on wsjtx. It seems to be the only software supporting the FT-747GX properly. 73 vk4tux On 29/1/24 23:40, Black Michael wrote: What version of Hamlib are you

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

2024-01-29 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
Assuming this is repeatable we now need to see FLRig debug data to see why mode is not being read correctly. So Config/Setup/Trace and turn on all the checkboxes.   Duplicate the problem.  Then find the trace.txt file in flrig.files and send it to me. Mike W9MDB On Monday, January 29,

Re: [wsjt-devel] Polling Disable

2024-01-29 Thread Black Michael via wsjt-devel
What version of Hamlib are you running?  There's currently no way to disable polling. rigctl-wsjtx --version FT747 behavior was supposedly fixed Aug 2022. Please place this file as described below https://www.dropbox.com/s/t52ngcalsgnpm8m/wsjtx_log_config.ini?dl=0

[wsjt-devel] Unwanted Band Activity background color

2024-01-29 Thread Rich - K1HTV via wsjt-devel
Many times a day, using the most current and previous WSJT-X improved versions, the background color for the entire Band Activity column changes from the normal white to a color. The only way to go back to the desired no-color background is to do a right click, erase. But that wipes out the recent

[wsjt-devel] "Highlight orange:" feature

2024-01-29 Thread Rich - K1HTV via wsjt-devel
I have been using the "Highlight orange:" feature in the "Colors" tab screen, and have added a number of /MM callsigns to the comma delimited list of stations that I'm interested in re-working for new water grids. I noticed that in the Band Activity column, when a station on that list that I had

Re: [wsjt-devel] Problem with WSJT-X 2.7.0 RC3 and Hamlib +Flrig

2024-01-29 Thread Richard Shaw via wsjt-devel
On Sun, Jan 28, 2024 at 10:16 PM Black Michael wrote: > What rig? For some reason that call is not returning any value for your > rig when getting the current mode. > FT-991A Thanks, Richard ___ wsjt-devel mailing list