Different cmake error but still problems on Pi3. No problems with 2.6.1
Greg g4cui
Making all in tests
libtool: link: gcc -Wall -g -O2 -fPIC -fdata-sections -ffunction-sections
-Wl,--gc-sections -o rigctl rigctl-rigctl.o rigctl-rigctl_parse.o
rigctl-dumpcaps.o rigctl-dumpstate.o rigctl-rig_tests.o
../src/.libs/libhamlib.a -lusb-1.0 ../lib/.libs/libmisc.a -ldl -lm -pthread
../src/.libs/libhamlib.a(yaesu.o): In function `initrigs4_yaesu':
/home/pi/Downloads/hamlib-prefix/src/hamlib/rigs/yaesu/yaesu.c:127: undefined
reference to `ft9000Old_caps'
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
Makefile:1118: recipe for target 'rigctl' failed
make[4]: *** [rigctl] Error 1
Makefile:632: recipe for target 'all-recursive' failed
make[3]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
CMakeFiles/hamlib-install.dir/build.make:65: recipe for target
'hamlib-prefix/src/hamlib-stamp/hamlib-build' failed
make[2]: *** [hamlib-prefix/src/hamlib-stamp/hamlib-build] Error 2
CMakeFiles/Makefile2:195: recipe for target 'CMakeFiles/hamlib-install.dir/all'
failed
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/hamlib-install.dir/all] Error 2
Makefile:83: recipe for target 'all' failed
make: *** [all] Error 2
From: wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: 24 January 2024 16:46
To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
Subject: wsjt-devel Digest, Vol 119, Issue 42
Send wsjt-devel mailing list submissions to
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net
You can reach the person managing the list at
wsjt-devel-ow...@lists.sourceforge.net
When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of wsjt-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: Making F/H idiot proof (Reino Talarmo)
2. Re: Making F/H idiot proof (Jeff Stillinger)
--
Message: 1
Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2024 18:13:10 +0200
From: "Reino Talarmo"
To: "'WSJT software development'"
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Making F/H idiot proof
Message-ID: <009001da4ee0$3a06dca0$ae1495e0$@kolumbus.fi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Hi, I think that the Fox simply ignores the ?R+rpt? part of the message and
takes it to be a Tx1 message. So Fox sends a report. The Hound station autoseq
may not work correctly as it has not sent the Tx1 at all. A resending of the
?R+rpt? should be a correct message. The Hound station sends only Tx1 and Tx3
in the protocol. Fox should not response by RR73, if it has not sent a Tx2 and
received after that a R+rpt. No short-cuts allowed.
Well, it is another issue how to get operators to read user guides!
73, Reino OH3mA
From: Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel [mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net]
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 5:48 PM
To: Brian Moran ; WSJT software development
Cc: Andy Durbin
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Making F/H idiot proof
Hi Brian,
The screen shot and the discussion are in the Clipperton groups.io messages.
Clipperton is certainly using WSJT-X and operating as Fox. It appears the
"user" saw a TX5S CQ and replied with TX3. TX5S responded with TX2.
ref - https://groups.io/g/Clipperton-2024/message/388
You may need to sign up for the group to read messages. Private email if you
like me to send a copy of the screen shot. I don't think this "list" will
allow images.
73,
Andy, k3wyc
_
From: Brian Moran mailto:brian.mo...@gmail.com> >
Sent: Wednesday, January 24, 2024 8:36 AM
To: WSJT software development mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
Cc: Andy Durbin mailto:a.dur...@msn.com> >
Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Making F/H idiot proof
Hi Andy; can you please help me understand the circumstances better?
Under ?normal? f/h operation, the hound calls with a grid. WSJT-X in fox mode
can queue a caller with a grid. WSJT-X in fox mode doesn?t queue
non-grid-supplying callers.
If the ?fox? replied to a signal report message as the first call, perhaps the
fox wasn?t using f/h mode? Perhaps not using wsjt-x?
The calling operator could have used the manual message selection buttons to
change their message to the ?fox? reflecting the circumstances, and they could
have manually logged the station at the appropriate point in the sequence. It
seems they might have partially done that, since if I understand what you are
writing, they found and started with the TX3 message.
If you could point me to more information and the screenshot, I?d like to
follow up to understand this situation better.
Thanks,
-Brian N9ADG
Sent via iPhone
On Jan 24, 2024, at 7:16?AM, Andy Durbin via wsjt-devel
mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> >
wrote:
?
As implemented in WSJT-X ver 2.6.1 the hound is able to select TX3 as their
first transmission. One user
