Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 14:13:49 + Bill Somerville wrote: > On 29/12/2015 14:00, Richard Bown wrote: > > Just the audio card to sort out, if Hardkernel don't produce an audio > > card,can a USB audio card > > be recommended that wont break the bank ??? > > Hi Richard, >

[wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
Hi All and a happy new year for Thursday Is anyone running either WSJTX or WSJT10 on an ODROID XU4 SBC, which is a 2x quadcore ( octal core) SBC. It should have enough grunt to run either, but I'm not sure of the state of QT5 on ubuntu armhf The one concern I have is it uses eMMC flash for

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Richard Bown
On Tue, 29 Dec 2015 06:32:58 -0700 Greg Beam wrote: > Hi Bill, Richard, > > At present, ARMv7 builds have to be specifically enabled per package by > the Launchpad administrators. All of the WSJT-X packages I have on > Launchpad are ARMv7 build enabled (current 1.6.0 GA

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 14:00, Richard Bown wrote: > Just the audio card to sort out, if Hardkernel don't produce an audio > card,can a USB audio card be > recommended that wont break the bank ??? Hi Richard, most cheap USB audio devices work well enough. They should support 48kHz sample rates for

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Bill Somerville
On 29/12/2015 12:21, Richard Bown wrote: > My main use is MS FSK441 Hi Richard, I do not think we are doing official Ubuntu ARM WSJT-X package builds yet but there's no reason I know of that would preclude using WSJT-X on that platform. There are certainly RasPi2 users and that runs WSJT-X

Re: [wsjt-devel] ARMv7 compatibility

2015-12-29 Thread Greg Beam
Hi Bill, Richard, At present, ARMv7 builds have to be specifically enabled per package by the Launchpad administrators. All of the WSJT-X packages I have on Launchpad are ARMv7 build enabled (current 1.6.0 GA Release, and v1.7.0 Testing version). As fare as I am aware, there's no reason WSJT