On 8/5/23 17:00, Reino Talarmo wrote:
Sent: sunnuntai 7. toukokuuta 2023 23.29
Why would i talk about non wsjtx usage on a wsjtx group ?
It is important to use commonly used words in the same meaning in the ham
community. There are many radio amateurs that have used other modes, some even
On 4/27/2023 12:28 PM, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
Yes exactly. After hundreds of QSOs and two+ years that's getting old.
But I do really understand the issues with revising good code.
Except for contesting, it has ALWAYS been good operating practice to do
a LOT more listening than
Yes exactly. After hundreds of QSOs and two+ years that's getting old.
But I do really understand the issues with revising good code.
--73, Glenn, AF8C
On 4/27/2023 12:28 PM, Fred Price wrote:
Glenn,
Why not just stop the second xmit time sequence by hitting the the Enable Tx or
Halt Tx
Hi Glen,
I have my TX watchdog set to 3 minutes. I just let it time out to check
my frequency.
Larry / W1DYJ
On 4/27/2023 12:00, Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel wrote:
Good Day,
FT8/4 enhancement suggestion follows.
(I know that stable code can be broken by side effects and "better is
s
Ämne: [wsjt-devel] Enhancement suggestion - 30 second cycles
Good Day,
FT8/4 enhancement suggestion follows.
(I know that stable code can be broken by side effects and "better is the enemy
of good enough".)
For example, with FT8, instead of having two 15 second transmission cycles per
mi
Glenn,
Why not just stop the second xmit time sequence by hitting the the Enable Tx or
Halt Tx button? Then re-enable xmit by hitting the Enable Tx for the next
sequence you want to xmit. After all you are the control operator for your
station. Also then no changes to the code need to be made.
Good Day,
FT8/4 enhancement suggestion follows.
(I know that stable code can be broken by side effects and "better is
the enemy of good enough".)
For example, with FT8, instead of having two 15 second transmission
cycles per minute, it would be nice to have the option of ONE 15 second
