Latest and greatest Raspberry Pi with Raspbian Stretch up to date, which does
not include Pulseaudio as standard. I have an mcHF 0.7 with UHSDR software
about 7 days old, coupled with a single USB lead for both CAT and Audio.
Installed FlDigi from the Package Management tool and WSJTX latest
Hi Paul,
I can't speak for others, but no offense taken here.
Following Bills advice clearly demonstrates the difference between
Single-Thread (1 core), and Multi-Thread (-j x ) compiling, e.g.
resource consumption, as $(MAKE), when called without the -j operator
defaults to Single-Thread,
On 17/01/2016 17:30, Paul wrote:
I had to separately run the following before success. But now
everything is ok.
$ make plotter.cpp.o
$ make main.cpp.o
$ make mainwindow.cpp.o
Also I would like to say that I am very sorry if I have caused any
offence, that was not my intension.
Hi Paul,
no
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 11:44:27 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> With respect to Hamlib, WSJT-X is build with Hamlib support, with HRD
> support, with DX Lab Suite support, and on Windows with OmniRIg support.
> You also have the option to select "None" for CAT control if
On 17/01/2016 12:30, Richard Bown wrote:
> At the moment if the select any of the versions of wsjtx from the menu it
> automatically builds
> hamlib whether its needed or not, it would make far more sense to have the
> option no to include
> hamlib if its not needed, also saves space
> At the
On 17/01/2016 10:44, Richard Bown wrote:
> We seem to have a literacy problem on this list which I'm getting very hacked
> off about
>
> I realise that English is a language that sounds the same but since getting
> Websterised
> on the American continental mass no longer translates to the same
Not much point staying on a list like this :(
On Sun, 17 Jan 2016 08:27:48 -0700
Greg Beam wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> On 1/17/2016 03:44, Richard Bown wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > We seem to have a literacy problem on this list which I'm getting very
> > hacked off about
>
>
Hi Richard,
On 1/17/2016 03:44, Richard Bown wrote:
>
>
>
> We seem to have a literacy problem on this list which I'm getting very hacked
> off about
The OP question / problem was this:
http://sourceforge.net/p/wsjt/mailman/message/34771228/
I answered with this:
Just to say that I followed the advice given by Bill
Try changing working directory to the build tree root and doing:
$ rm CMakeFiles/wsjtx.dir/plotter.cpp.o
$ make plotter.cpp.o
and see if the ICE recurs.
73
Bill
G4WJS.
I had to separately run the following before success. But now
On 16/01/2016 11:10, Paul wrote:
> Hi I looked at the lines following the compile failure of wsjtx using
> jtsdk on my raspberry pi 2 and it is as follows:
> I am using Ubuntu Mate not Raspbian, although I could set up Raspbian
> if there is any interest.
> The code is version 4.0 r6403
Ubuntu
Hi Richard,
This is ill advised for a number of reasons.
>
> "if someone tells me which
> files after the build are essential to running wsjtx I make a built tarball
> available."
>
Just to name a few:
[1] Joe has asked ( on more than one occasion ) that we not
re-distribute unofficial
Hi I looked at the lines following the compile failure of wsjtx using jtsdk on
my raspberry pi 2 and it is as follows:
I am using Ubuntu Mate not Raspbian, although I could set up Raspbian if there
is any interest.
The code is version 4.0 r6403
c++: internal compiler error: Killed (program
Hi Richard,
His problem is during the build not after. If he's installed JTSDK he
has all the runtime files he needs. Likewise, if he's installed WSJT-X
from either the formal release .deb ( using Gdebi etc) that would also
resolve the runtime deps.
There is already a method in place for
On Sat, 16 Jan 2016 11:12:04 -0700
Greg Beam wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> More than likely you've run out of system resources.
>
> I would create a swap partition if you don't already have one (at least
> 1GB to 2 GB) and you may want to edit /usr/bin/jtsdk-wsjtx to use only
>
Hi Paul,
More than likely you've run out of system resources.
I would create a swap partition if you don't already have one (at least
1GB to 2 GB) and you may want to edit /usr/bin/jtsdk-wsjtx to use only
one or two cores rather than all 4 cores.
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 1/15/2016 10:53, Paul
On 15/01/2016 12:31, Paul wrote:
> Can any one tell me if the IQ software will be added to wsjtx.
Hi Paul,
it is not currently being worked on. In general there are two related
issues with using IQ data, firstly it has to be "demodulated" and
secondly the mode and frequency of demodulation
On 15/01/16 12:42, Bill Somerville wrote:
> I suggest that you investigate using HDSDR or similar as an intermediary
> between the receiver (and transmitter) and WSJT-X
Paul
I use dttsp/sdr-shell/jack running on Mint linux for this purpose.
It works well.
73
Nick G3VNC
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:46:44 -0200
"Edson W. R. Pereira" wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Ok! My apologies. I must have misunderstood what you wrote.
>
> 73, Edson PY2SDR
>
>
HI Edson
I tried to simplify it as much as possible, may be too much, but I was under
the impression
Thanks for your comments and suggestions.
I agree that a complex detector is not needed to decode signals from a Softrock
and I have been able to decode JT65 and JT9 signals using wsjtx on both my RPi
2 and windows.
The RPi 2 version of wsjtx I use was via a direct download.
I did not
Hi Richard,
Ok! My apologies. I must have misunderstood what you wrote.
73, Edson PY2SDR
---
- We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together.
- Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se
trabalharmos juntos.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 2:39 PM,
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 12:42:35 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 15/01/2016 12:31, Paul wrote:
> > Can any one tell me if the IQ software will be added to wsjtx.
> Hi Paul,
>
> it is not currently being worked on. In general there are two related
> issues with using IQ
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 13:32:35 +
nick wrote:
> On 15/01/16 12:42, Bill Somerville wrote:
> > I suggest that you investigate using HDSDR or similar as an intermediary
> > between the receiver (and transmitter) and WSJT-X
>
> Paul
>
> I use dttsp/sdr-shell/jack running on Mint
Hello Nick,
I am glad to see that sdr-shell is still useful and is still being used ten
years after I first released it.
73, Edson PY2SDR
---
- We humans have the capability to do amazing things if we work together.
- Nós seres humanos temos a capacidade de fazer coisas incríveis se
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 14:23:48 -0200
"Edson W. R. Pereira" wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Richard Bown wrote:
>
> >
> > You can feed a SDR with just an single audio feed and you will see the
> > local ocillator and a
> > positive spectrum on
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 11:31 AM, Richard Bown wrote:
>
> You can feed a SDR with just an single audio feed and you will see the
> local ocillator and a
> positive spectrum on the right and a negative on the left, using a I
> input allows you to remove
> the unwanted sideband
On 15/01/2016 17:53, Paul wrote:
> C++ internal compiler error, immediately after Building CXX object ...
> /echograph.cpp.o
Compiler ICE messages are sometimes due to resource limitations. If you
are using a parallel build (-j) then try without it. Try increasing the
process virtual memory
On Fri, 15 Jan 2016 17:53:37 -
"Paul" wrote:
> Thanks for your comments and suggestions.
>
> I agree that a complex detector is not needed to decode signals from a
> Softrock and I have been
> able to decode JT65 and JT9 signals using wsjtx on both my RPi 2
On 15/01/16 14:41, Richard Bown wrote:
> core to shell are usable with a network
> connection between. there is a separate yahoo group for this
I did not know that.
What is the group name please Richard?
73
Nick G3VNC
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 23:03:06 -0200
"Edson W. R. Pereira" wrote:
> I think the wsjt-x will run well on a R-Pi 2, but I am not sure it will run
> on a R-Pi 1 Compiling wsjt-x may take some effort though. I have Steve's
> wspr stand alone decoder (C implementation) running on a
Hi Richard,
Yes, but that is a native ARMHF environment (Ubuntu Mate armv7 / Debian
- Raspbian etc ). What Bill is after is a cross-compile-setup, say Linux
amd64 base, then cross compile for armv7.
73's
Greg, KI7MT
On 01/13/2016 10:16 AM, Richard Bown wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:58:07
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 21:41:59 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 21:28, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Therefore, IHO, its better to use a QEMU VM on a linux host and know your
> > code works, than to
> > just cross compile and hope it works.
> Hi Richard,
>
> You say:
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 11:28:22 -0700
KI7MT wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> Yes, but that is a native ARMHF environment (Ubuntu Mate armv7 / Debian
> - Raspbian etc ). What Bill is after is a cross-compile-setup, say Linux
> amd64 base, then cross compile for armv7.
>
> 73's
> Greg,
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 22:23:48 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 22:10, Richard Bown wrote:
> > I'm not going to get in to argument over it Bill.
> > But if you want to open WSJTX up to everyone with a tablet cross compile
> > and hope wont work.
> > The old
On 13/01/2016 21:28, Richard Bown wrote:
> Therefore, IHO, its better to use a QEMU VM on a linux host and know your
> code works, than to just
> cross compile and hope it works.
Hi Richard,
You say:
"The disadvantage of cross compiling is you still need to test it"
Are you implying that build
On 13/01/2016 22:10, Richard Bown wrote:
> I'm not going to get in to argument over it Bill.
> But if you want to open WSJTX up to everyone with a tablet cross compile and
> hope wont work.
> The old argument that tablets cant be used due to audio drivers is extinct.
Whoa! Where did tablets come
Hi Bill,
On 1/13/2016 15:23, Bill Somerville wrote:
> My requirement is on behalf of users that have little or no development
> experience and want to use a SoC type boards like the
> PI2/BeagleBlack/fill in your preference of ARM based hardware in their
> shacks or portable stations with a
All,
I agree completely with Edson's command-line proposal. Not only would it open
up new use cases (recording traffic heard for propagation studies, etc), it may
also help with fine-grained functional and performance testing.
--
David Tiller
Sr. Architect/Lead Consultant | CapTech
(804)
I think the wsjt-x will run well on a R-Pi 2, but I am not sure it will run
on a R-Pi 1 Compiling wsjt-x may take some effort though. I have Steve's
wspr stand alone decoder (C implementation) running on a R-Pi 1 and it
works very well.
For JT65/JT9 and other QSO modes on small devices, I think
Hello
I fear a lack of computing performance.
Paolo IW1acl
Il 13/01/2016 16:25, Paul ha scritto:
Hello
I am thinking of installing JTSDK with a view to building wsjtx and
wspr on my Raspberry Pi 2.
Does anyone have any experience of this?
Regards
Paul m1bkl
On 13/01/2016 15:25, Paul wrote:
> I am thinking of installing JTSDK with a view to building wsjtx and
> wspr on my Raspberry Pi 2.
> Does anyone have any experience of this?
Hi Paul,
several users have built WSJT-X for the Rasberry Pi2 successfully. AFAIK
they have all built on the target
Hello
I am thinking of installing JTSDK with a view to building wsjtx and wspr on my
Raspberry Pi 2.
Does anyone have any experience of this?
Regards
Paul m1bkl--
Site24x7 APM Insight: Get Deep Visibility into
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:32:24 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 15:25, Paul wrote:
> > I am thinking of installing JTSDK with a view to building wsjtx and
> > wspr on my Raspberry Pi 2.
> > Does anyone have any experience of this?
> Hi Paul,
>
> several users
On 13/01/2016 16:52, Richard Bown wrote:
> Hi Bill you could try this:-
> https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Virtual_ARM_Linux_environment
Hi Richard,
I know how to build a cross tools environment but the devil is always in
the detail. I was hoping someone with a
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 15:25:44 -
"Paul" wrote:
> Hello
>
> I am thinking of installing JTSDK with a view to building wsjtx and wspr on
> my Raspberry Pi 2.
> Does anyone have any experience of this?
>
> Regards
> Paul m1bkl
Yes it should be OK , wsjtx and
On Wed, 13 Jan 2016 16:58:07 +
Bill Somerville wrote:
> On 13/01/2016 16:52, Richard Bown wrote:
> > Hi Bill you could try this:-
> > https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Mozilla/Developer_guide/Virtual_ARM_Linux_environment
> Hi Richard,
>
> I know how to build
45 matches
Mail list logo