Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Karl Barth
Hi Bill, Thanks. I do NOT have a general problem with the modified frequency settings - each method  has its merrits!  For me it was easier before, may be due to habitude.  (when I was younger I adapted faster  hi) About the frequency table I cwill take your advice and re-install RC3 to

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Karl Barth
Hi Neil, Thanks for your reply. I followed some of the discussions - also on the band (s) there is just no "BEST" solution - its just a personal feeling, may be habitude - so I try to adjust myself to what is offered as many persons involved have tried to optimize the program /with success) 73,

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Neil Zampella
Hi Charly, I can only speak to the frequency list issue.   These release candidates are advanced BETA programs, they are not final.    Once the program goes to general release, you would not have to worry about resetting the frequency list. The list reset 'should' not happen if you stay on

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Bill Somerville
On 23/10/2017 15:58, Karl Barth wrote: Every update (or reset) re-creates the default frequency tables. An option NOT to override existing databases would be really helpful. I have not found a way how to save and/or restore my personal frequency table to avoid a manual recreation of that

Re: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Charles Suckling
Charly I believe its possible to save your table: 73 Charlie G3WDG _ From: Karl Barth [mailto:df5...@darc.de] Sent: 23 October 2017 15:58 To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: [wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3) Thanks for explaining your comment

[wsjt-devel] WSJT-x User feed back (1.8 RC3)

2017-10-23 Thread Karl Barth
Thanks for explaining your comment rules,  so I registered as proposed. 73, Charly   My personal comment again: Hello, I use WSJT-x in ist various versions since abt 2 years and have seen many changes and improvements and for sure, I appreciate all the efforts put in such a complex software.