I got our developer to put an 'id' in. I got this to work in irb, but
cannot get it to work in my script.
If I use
ie.span(:id, 'submitted').flash
The proper text will flash.
When I use
ie.span(:id, 'submitted').text
Nothing is displayed.
I'm a little baffled by this. Any ideas?
--
HAVE YOU LOOKED INTO THE UNITTEST FOR SPAN?
oops caps lock was on , sorry!
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Eric Tabora [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Wednesday, August 17, 2005 11:18 am
Subject: RE: [SPAM] - Re: [Wtr-general] Returning a string - Email found in
subject
I got our developer to
Michael,
I don't doubt your intentions and wish you best of luck. Keep us informed
of progress.
And when you are ready for release, please set up a separate mailing list
for all the clueless newbies who are are now going to be watir scripters!
Bret
At 01:22 PM 8/17/2005, Michael Kelly
How about just 'exists?'
Note that the algorithm below will return false if the browser is hidden.
Is that what you want?
Bret
At 01:41 PM 8/17/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
Do you have check in rights?
Bret, I think this would be a useful addition - is the method name corect?
maybe
1. finish purging all camelCase names in methods and local and instance
variables.
2. finish renaming stuff that has the wrong name (like all the references
to containers called 'ieController')
3. separate logic for locating objects (get_object) so it can be configured
separately without having
I wanna hear from the WET guys on this. Satti? Raghu?
There are two parts of the problem.
1. Just click the buttons and working the controls. WET has this licked.
2. Avoiding the thread-locking. WET uses a method similar to our
IE#remote_eval. But i have ideas on how to make this better.
Bret
Is it possible to pull the text contents out of JavaScript popups as well?
That would be a big bonus, particularly on pages that might use a lot of
them for different reasons and you want to be sure the right one popped up,
or to validate the contents of them. I found SilkTest, one JavaScript
Hi Bret,
Thanks for your testimonials. It is a great boost for our team.
We look forward to working more with you.
Raghu
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I really like WET and looking over its code has strongly influenced
the direction that i want to take Watir in.
For background, see this:
I want it all in a pretty package. :-)
-Jonathan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Rogers
Sent: August 17, 2005 8:30 PM
To: wtr-general@rubyforge.org
Subject: RE: [Wtr-general] next steps
There is some stuff in winclicker to
Comments inline
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I wanna hear from the WET guys on this. Satti? Raghu?
There are two parts of the problem.
1. Just click the buttons and working the controls. WET has this licked.
2. Avoiding the thread-locking. WET uses a method similar to our
IE#remote_eval. But i
7. make a gem
how could i forget -- kingsley is helping me with this.
_
Bret Pettichord
www.pettichord.com
___
Wtr-general mailing list
Wtr-general@rubyforge.org
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-general
At 05:46 PM 8/17/2005, Paul Rogers wrote:
some other things that we should consider:
table#to_a currently returns the cells as text. I think ( I think it was
Bret that suggested it) this should return an array of TableCell objects
which menas we need Table#to_text_array ( or similar name).
IE.ie.visible == false is what i meant, but minimized is also a good point.
Does a minimized browser have an hWnd?
This is complex enough that i'd just rather encourage people to use
IE.ie.hWnd != -1 for now.
BTW, i recently checked in IE#minimize, but i didn't think that maybe it
should be
At 10:37 PM 8/17/2005, Raghu Venkataramana wrote:
Comments inline
Bret Pettichord wrote:
I wanna hear from the WET guys on this. Satti? Raghu?
There are two parts of the problem.
1. Just click the buttons and working the controls. WET has this licked.
2. Avoiding the thread-locking. WET uses
At 10:22 PM 8/17/2005, Jeff Wood wrote:
So, when are the two projects simply going to merge? I mean, it sounds
like all of the involved parties wouldn't mind...
Well, that is the topic under discussion. Like a marriage, there are many
things to discuss...
_
Bret
15 matches
Mail list logo
