Re: [wxhaskell-devel] wxc/ore? linking problem

2012-07-01 Thread Henry Lockyer
RESULT/S: - Managed to get wxcore and wxc installed and working, to helloworld level, based on the latest github master. - All Eric's helloworld examples now compile and generally work, incl. wxcore and wx versions, without the link error problem posted below. Henrys-iMac:wx henrylockyer$

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] wxc/ore? linking problem

2012-06-30 Thread Henry Lockyer
Sorry - I was really meaning 'included in Hackage' so that I could use 'cabal install', in case that wasn't obvious. I see, superficially at least, everything seems to be there on github master for wxc 0.90.04 and wxcore 0.90.04, so I'll have a go at installing these 'manually' (wx seems to be

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] wxc/ore? linking problem

2012-06-27 Thread Jeremy O'Donoghue
There are a couple of possibilities: 1) (which I think can be discounted, given your description of 'removed everything and started again') is that you didn't do a clean build. The dependency checking for wxc is rather fragile (bacause Cabal does not know about C dependencies). 2) More likely:

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] wxc/ore? linking problem

2012-06-27 Thread Henry Lockyer
ok + thanks. I guess I'll wait for updated cabal if it is imminent . Re (1) I could double-check this in the meantime perhaps, but what to look for exactly? (I relied on cabal install wx cabal-macosx on an empty local user pkg lib to get it right.) Regards/ Henry On 27 Jun 2012, at 15:28,

Re: [wxhaskell-devel] wxc/ore? linking problem

2012-06-27 Thread Henry Lockyer
Hi Eric Yes I have been essentially following that as a rational approach (though I guess you mean wxWidgets, wxcore, wx ) and I have used all your samples (thanks!). It's good to have a potted example to check out each level. I realise your readme instructions are skeletal but maybe worth