On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 09:15:03 +0100, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
> Perhaps we should do this work in a branch (I've never tried
> this in Darcs - how easy is it Eric?)
The mechanics of maintaining a Darcs branch are simple enough;
you just push to a separate directory, say
http://code.haskell.o
On 26 July 2011 09:15, Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
> On 26 July 2011 06:59, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:28:01 +0100, Dave Tapley wrote:
>> > I'm getting the impression that most people are using wxWidgets 2.9 with
>> > wxHaskell, is that a fair assumption?
>>
>> I was surpris
On 26 July 2011 06:59, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:28:01 +0100, Dave Tapley wrote:
> > I'm getting the impression that most people are using wxWidgets 2.9 with
> > wxHaskell, is that a fair assumption?
>
> I was surprised by your impression, but now I see why you may feel that
On 26 July 2011 06:59, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:28:01 +0100, Dave Tapley wrote:
> > I'm getting the impression that most people are using wxWidgets 2.9 with
> > wxHaskell, is that a fair assumption?
>
> I was surprised by your impression, but now I see why you may feel that
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 00:28:01 +0100, Dave Tapley wrote:
> I'm getting the impression that most people are using wxWidgets 2.9 with
> wxHaskell, is that a fair assumption?
I was surprised by your impression, but now I see why you may feel that
way.
It turns out wxWidgets 2.9 was released early
I'm getting the impression that most people are using wxWidgets 2.9 with
wxHaskell, is that a fair assumption?
I've just grabbed the latest dev release (2.9.2) of wxWidgets because I'm
still getting errors trying to compile against the 2.8.10 version I got from
the Ubuntu repositories (I'm going t
