On Thu, 16 Jun 2011, Heinrich Apfelmus wrote:
> I'm currently working on the FRP part [1]. It turns out that FRP is
> completely orthogonal to wxHaskell; there is no need to add special
> support for FRP in the GUI library. A handful of convenience wrappers
> [2] are enough to transform wxHaskell
Jeremy O'Donoghue wrote:
> - Extend Graphics.UI.WX so that more of the core functionality has
> high-level wrappers, e.g. for Grid, List boxes etc. I would love to
> see an FRP wrapper around parts of wxHaskell, and think we could
> reinstate one or more of the FRP libraries, for example. Making
[x-posting wxhaskell-devel]
On 12 June 2011 18:43, Guy wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 20:07, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> > On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 19:54:13 +0300, Guy wrote:
> >> I'm trying to get a GUI package included in the Haskell Platform. The
> >> platform's inclusion policy requires that (one
> >> of?)
On 12/06/2011 20:07, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 19:54:13 +0300, Guy wrote:
>> I'm trying to get a GUI package included in the Haskell Platform. The
>> platform's inclusion policy requires that (one
>> of?) the package's official maintainers supports the proposal.
>
> We may need t
On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 19:54:13 +0300, Guy wrote:
> I'm trying to get a GUI package included in the Haskell Platform. The
> platform's inclusion policy requires that (one
> of?) the package's official maintainers supports the proposal.
We may need to think strategically about this.
gtk2hs is mu
