On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 10:12:34AM -0800, Curt, WE7U wrote:
>
> Is IPv6 truly needed?
I guess that's a matter for debate; having used IPv6 for over 10 years I
kind of regard it as standard but I'm not aware of many sites that don't
also have IPv4.
However the presence of an record in DNS
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, David Brooke G6GZH wrote:
With the mention of the wiki I was just having a look at it and it
seemed slow - looks like IPv6 routing is broken from me at least
traceroute to xastir.org (2001:1868:205::1001) from
2001:8b0:3d7:1:c9ac:a899:bdcb:1d59, 30 hops max, 24 byte
With the mention of the wiki I was just having a look at it and it
seemed slow - looks like IPv6 routing is broken from me at least
traceroute to xastir.org (2001:1868:205::1001) from
2001:8b0:3d7:1:c9ac:a899:bdcb:1d59, 30 hops max, 24 byte packets
1 rb-lan.dbrooke.me.uk (2001:8b0:3d7:1::1)
On Thu, 8 Feb 2018, Tom Russo wrote:
If there is anyone who would like to take on tasks of wiki clean-up (it's
pretty stale) and documentation proofreading, please jump on board.
If anyone points out particular pages / sections of pages that need updating I
can do some. If they contain
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 11:52:48 -0700
Tom Russo wrote:
> To test out the release mechanism on github, I've gone ahead and
> created a "new" Xastir 2.0.8 release branch (branched from the
> xastir208 tag that was used for the SourceForge stable release),
> bootstrapped it, pushed it
On Thu, Feb 08, 2018 at 04:00:22PM +, we recorded a bogon-computron
collision of the flavor, containing:
> On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:52:48AM -0700, Tom Russo wrote:
> >
> > If you're a package maintainer for any OS, you might start looking into how
> > you have to
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:52:48AM -0700, Tom Russo wrote:
>
> If you're a package maintainer for any OS, you might start looking into how
> you have to change your package build process to access the Github release
> tarballs instead of SourceForge.
I've made the necessary changes for CRUX.