I agree: neither parentheses (nor [] or {}, for that matter), nor quotes
(plain or curly, single or double), nor HTML-like markup should disable
conversion to title case.
On 15 November 2015 at 06:04, Frank Bennett wrote:
> Sounds good. That was my question on that one.
>
I do think italics and small-caps (and possibly superscript/subscript
too) markup should disable title casing.
Example:
L-Malic acid formation by immobilized Saccharomyces cerevisiae
amplified for fumarase
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0141-0229(91)90122-Q
"L-Malic acid" starts with an all-caps
Yes, definitely. Since there is no mechanism to explicitly force uppercase,
the titlecaser needs to be inclusive by default, and we must be able to
selectively suppress capitalisation where it is incorrect.
`` markup, e.g., `The Arabidopsis lyrata genome sequence and the
basis of rapid genome
Thanks Frank!
>("explicit is better than implicit").
was exactly my thinking wrt casing and rich text, so very much agree with
you on that.
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Frank Bennett
wrote:
> Thanks to all for the feedback.
>
> Disabling of no-case in quoted text is
Thanks to all for the feedback.
Disabling of no-case in quoted text is now available for testing in
the latest citeproc-js release, and in the Propachi plugins for
Zotero:
https://bitbucket.org/fbennett/citeproc-js/src
https://juris-m.github.io/downloads/#csl-stuff
The i, b, sc, sub,
That's getting rather tricky and we're hitting the limits of what simple
rich text markup can do:
For species, Rintze is correct:
- Lowercase the second part of a species name, such as *fulvescens* in
*Acipenser
fulvescens*, even if it is the last word in a title or subtitle.
but that's not the
sorry for chiming in late, the original e-mail had actually gotten caught
in Spam. I agree with bwiernik -- while the two other issue you raise are
right, quotation marks shouldn't disable casing. See e.g.
Bruccoli, Matthew J., ed. *“An Artist Is His Own Fault”: John O’Hara on
Writers and
Sorry, I wasn't very clear. I included the citation just to give an example
set of data for which the quote rule would not always work--didn't mean to
illustrate a specific format.
The title is stored in the reference manager as:
“General intelligence,” objectively determined and measured
I don't think the literal tags for words in quotes are correct. For example,
this reference:
Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and
measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2), 201–292.
http://doi.org/10.2307/1412107
"General intelligence," should
On Sun, Nov 15, 2015 at 1:37 PM, bwiernik wrote:
> I don't think the literal tags for words in quotes are correct. For example,
> this reference:
>
> Spearman, C. (1904). “General intelligence,” objectively determined and
> measured. The American Journal of Psychology, 15(2),
Sounds good. That was my question on that one.
On Nov 15, 2015 14:38, "Sebastian Karcher"
wrote:
> sorry for chiming in late, the original e-mail had actually gotten caught
> in Spam. I agree with bwiernik -- while the two other issue you raise are
> right, quotation
Nick Bart caught a flaw in the citeproc-js title-casing method, and
Emiliano Heyns has done a bunch of additional testing. I've rewritten
part of the code for it, mostly to get nested tags to work correctly.
None of the changes impact existing tests, but a few things came up
that I thought I
12 matches
Mail list logo