Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-11 Thread Kevin Keane
Thank you, Yuan. That looks *very* interesting; I was actually looking at an HA setup, too. For this specific need, it seems like it would be problematic because this script seems to also share data; that's specifically what I do not want to do.

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-11 Thread Kevin Keane
Interesting idea, Nick. I'm not sure how that would work because when the nodes are booting up, initially they wouldn't know which VLAN to connect to. I don't have enough control over the switch to set up port-based VLANs. ___

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-11 Thread Yuan Y Bai
Hi Kevin,   We have a script xcatha.py can setup a standby xcat management node. It is used in one of xCAT HA solution. We can use it setup 2 inactive xcat management node, then,  use it active one of the xcat management node. You scenario is similar with our solution. You can find the related

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-07 Thread Nick Evans
Why not run the mgr and data networks for the new cluster in different vlans. That way you can leave the dhcp on both systems running and they will only respond to the requests for their respective clusters. Nick On Sat., 8 Dec. 2018, 8:22 am Rich Sudlow We do something slightly different by

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-07 Thread Rich Sudlow
We do something slightly different by not using a DHCP pool but only allow DHCP to answer with MACs that are know. On 12/7/18 1:30 PM, David Johnson wrote: Yes, only one can have a dynamic range.  In my case neither of them do, since I manually paste the MAC addresses into the mac table. My

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-07 Thread David Johnson
Yes, only one can have a dynamic range. In my case neither of them do, since I manually paste the MAC addresses into the mac table. My issue with deleting first is when I deleted 16 mac addresses and then got sidetracked and went home, those nodes later lost their lease and ended up getting

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-07 Thread Kevin Keane
Thank you, Dave. That is an interesting alternative approach; I might actually consider that. So you are saying that the old and new DHCP servers can run in parallel? I assume that they just can't both have dynamic ranges? I'm not sure I understand what the problem is with deleting a node first,

Re: [xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-06 Thread david_johnson
We’ve kept parallel clusters on the same network for nearly a year now while transitioning to RH7 from CentOS 6. Initially copied the hosts and nodelist and MAC tables into the new xcat database. Carefully controlled use of makedhcp so that nodes moving to the new cluster were first added to

[xcat-user] Staging a new management node but keeping it inactive?

2018-12-06 Thread Kevin Keane
I'm in the middle of upgrading our existing HPC (from RHEL 6 to RHEL 7). I'm doing most of my testing on a separate "sandbox" test bed, but now I'm close to going live. I'm trying to figure out how to do this with minimal disruption. My question: how can I install the new management node and keep