My apologies for not closing the loop on this one. For the archives...
On 02/10/2011 03:11 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:55:57AM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
Hi, folks,
Has anybody had luck using phy: disks with this version?
With*what* version?:)
This
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 01:55:57AM -0500, Bill McGonigle wrote:
Hi, folks,
Has anybody had luck using phy: disks with this version?
With *what* version? :)
I'm trying to create a new OpenSolaris DomU (nexenta 3.0.4) with two phy:
devices, and
instead of the expected behavior I'm seeing
On Mon, Jan 03, 2011 at 12:05:33AM -0600, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
This kernel works as expected with one exception. The exception has been
a nagging problem, but I have not reported it because 1) we are using
a research OS in DomU and 2) we are not clear if the problem is in our
code,
I have built what may be my last Fedora 12 kernel
(2.6.32.26-174.2.xendom0.fc12) as Fedora 12 EOLs today (this is the same
Fedora patch level as the official 2.6.32.26-175.fc12 kernel which has
just been released). It is available at
On Thu, Dec 02, 2010 at 09:17:41PM +, M A Young wrote:
On Thu, 2 Dec 2010, W. Michael Petullo wrote:
Moving forward and for the purposes of Fedora 15 development, can we get
both patched 2.7.37/38 kernels that support DomU and raw upstream
kernels? Or does xen/next-2.6.27 not have the
