On 14.08.15 at 12:50, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
Hi Shannon,
On 14/08/15 04:36, Shannon Zhao wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowi...@linaro.org
Ported from Linux commit 4ceacd02f5a1795c5c697e0345ee10beef675290.
acpi_parse_entries() allows to traverse all available table entries
On the VT-d troubleshooting page, I was informed to shoot you all a
message if Xen had to deactivate my VT-d due to errors in my BIOS (in
this case Coreboot). I am running John Lewis' Coreboot ROM for the
Chromebook Pixel 2 (samus) w/ the i7-5600U processor and Xen 4.4.2 on
Qubes. I downloaded
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 11:06 PM
Tearing down a 1:1 mapping that was never established isn't really nice
(and in fact hits an ASSERT() in p2m_remove_page()). Convert from a
wrapper macro to a proper function which then can take care of
Hi, Thanks for your reply:-)
Now, I know that the windows VM is crashed due to a not fully booted stub
domain. But why did the stub domain crash?
Thanks:-)
___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
http://lists.xen.org/xen-devel
From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
Sent: Wednesday, August 12, 2015 10:17 PM
... and its callers.
While all non-nested users are made fully honor the semantics of that
type, doing so in the nested case seemed insane (if doable at all,
considering VMCS shadowing), and hence
Hi Ian,
Please find attached new patches for the 'Qemu-dm 3.4 stable branch’
(git://xenbits.xen.org/qemu-xen-3.4-testing.git) with Signed-off-by included:
# sha256sum xsa140-qemut-3.4-?.patch
444b0487b6ae702b13626780b94cfe9d5b7e39c0b6ae26fc162fe93c84c83407
xsa140-qemut-3.4-1.patch
Hi Paul,
On 8/13/2015 6:39 PM, Yu, Zhang wrote:
On 8/13/2015 6:16 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Yu Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: 13 August 2015 11:06
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Paul Durrant; Ian Jackson; Stefano
Stabellini; Ian
Campbell; Wei
Hi,
does xen support per-core power-gating (pcpg) ?
--
Best Regards
Hamed Rostamzadeh,
MSc Student,
Distributed Systems Lab,
School of Computer Engineering,
Iran University of Science and Technology,
Tehran, Iran.
https://sites.google.com/site/hamedrostamzade/
* Greg KH gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 06:38:46PM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
On Thu, Aug 13, 2015 at 5:44 PM, gre...@linuxfoundation.org wrote:
This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
x86/ldt: Make modify_ldt
From: Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org
This patch has been added to the 3.12 stable tree. If you have any
objections, please let us know.
===
commit aa1acff356bbedfd03b544051f5b371746735d89 upstream.
The update_va_mapping hypercall can fail if the VA isn't present
in the guest's
On 2015/8/12 17:11, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/08/2015 08:22, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Hi,
Hi Shannon,
It's not part of the design discussion and we are avoiding to mix
discussion. Can you please create another thread (or at least renaming
the subject)?
I'm working on re-spinning this patchset
On 08/14/2015 06:38 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 31.07.15 at 18:06, boris.ostrov...@oracle.com wrote:
On 07/24/2015 05:41 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
@@ -1693,14 +1703,22 @@ int nvmx_handle_vmclear(struct cpu_user_
else
{
/* Even if this VMCS isn't the current one, we must
-Original Message-
From: Yu Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: 14 August 2015 13:03
To: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Paul Durrant; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini;
Ian
Campbell; Wei Liu; Keir (Xen.org); jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew Cooper
Cc: Kevin Tian; zhiyuan...@intel.com
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:21, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
it's even less clear how you'd expect to suppress this in other guest
OSes (Windows - afaik - being able to run on ARM certainly makes it
a
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 15:49 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:21:35PM +0300, M. Ivanov wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 10:47 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:14:28PM +0300, M. Ivanov wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 09:58 -0400, Konrad
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.08.15 at 19:01, ian.campb...@citrix.com wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 09:29 -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
A bunch of your questions seem to be about things which have been discussed
at length in previous postings, it's probably worth reviewing
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:49:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 13:52, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:48:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/page.h
On 14.08.2015 15:54, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 14:59, mpohl...@amazon.com wrote:
On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.08.15 at 16:09, mpohl...@amazon.de wrote:
Todo:
* Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
Because of?
The discussion in this thread:
On 14.08.15 at 15:21, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
it's even less clear how you'd expect to suppress this in other guest
OSes (Windows - afaik - being able to run on ARM certainly makes it
a candidate guest, even if maybe this doesn't work
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 01:57:01PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:56:58PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Add multiboot2 protocol support for relocatable images. Only GRUB2
with relevant patches
On 14.08.15 at 14:59, mpohl...@amazon.com wrote:
On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.08.15 at 16:09, mpohl...@amazon.de wrote:
Todo:
* Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
Because of?
The discussion in this thread:
[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3.1 2/2] xsplice:
On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/10/2015 05:03 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk
flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-armhf-armhf-xl-multivcpu 16 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 60152
Regressions
-Original Message-
From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: 14 August 2015 08:41
To: Paul Durrant; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini;
Ian
Campbell; Wei Liu; Keir (Xen.org); jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew Cooper
Cc: Kevin Tian; zhiyuan...@intel.com
Hi all:
Now a days, we tested Redhat 6.2(6.4) on Xen(version 4.1.2).
If we config the cpu number more than 32, it'll show 32 in
the VM, and if we config it 64 cpus, the VM will crash and
the log is list below.
Can someone tell us why is this happening?
Old RHEL6 kernels don't have
Hi, I compared the hvm domain start log when using device model stub domain
with that when using dom0 qemu:
the former log:
[2015-08-12 17:11:24] (d1) [ 135.565586] PCI-ISA link 0 routed to IRQ5
[2015-08-12 17:11:24] (d1) [ 135.565648] PCI-ISA link 1 routed to IRQ10
[2015-08-12 17:11:24] (d1) [
On 14/08/15 08:13, fowlsl...@riseup.net wrote:
On the VT-d troubleshooting page, I was informed to shoot you all a
message if Xen had to deactivate my VT-d due to errors in my BIOS (in
this case Coreboot). I am running John Lewis' Coreboot ROM for the
Chromebook Pixel 2 (samus) w/ the i7-5600U
PCI configuration space is not emulated by the hypervisor. There must be an
external emulator to handle config cycles which, in the general case, is either
QEMU or a stub domain. Either one of these must be running *before* the guest
is unpaused and hence allowed to generate I/O emulation
(Renaming the subject)
Hi Shannon,
On 14/08/15 15:05, Shannon Zhao wrote:
On 2015/8/12 17:11, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/08/2015 08:22, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Hi,
Hi Shannon,
It's not part of the design discussion and we are avoiding to mix
discussion. Can you please create another
On 14.08.15 at 15:59, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:49:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 13:52, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:48:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Daniel
On 14.08.15 at 16:03, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:21, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
it's even less clear how you'd expect to suppress this in other guest
OSes (Windows
Hi Julien,
On 2015/8/14 22:17, Julien Grall wrote:
(Renaming the subject)
Hi Shannon,
On 14/08/15 15:05, Shannon Zhao wrote:
On 2015/8/12 17:11, Julien Grall wrote:
On 12/08/2015 08:22, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Hi,
Hi Shannon,
It's not part of the design discussion and we are avoiding to
On 2015/8/14 22:29, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 16:16, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 05:36, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Shannon Zhao shannon.z...@linaro.org
Len Brown (1):
ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:32:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:59, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:49:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 13:52, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:48:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 16:03, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:21, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
it's even less clear how you'd expect to
On 14/08/15 15:35, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Do you copy data in the newly allocated memory between 2 xzalloc_bytes?
No, I just use xzalloc_bytes to allocate some place and copy ACPI to the
allocated place, modify the content, then call
raw_copy_to_guest_flush_dcache to copy the modified tables to
On 14/08/15 15:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 16:03, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:21, stefano.stabell...@eu.citrix.com wrote:
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 05:36, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Shannon Zhao shannon.z...@linaro.org
Len Brown (1):
ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found
Tomasz Nowicki (1):
ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed
On 14.08.15 at 16:16, shannon.z...@linaro.org wrote:
On 2015/8/14 18:24, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 05:36, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Shannon Zhao shannon.z...@linaro.org
Len Brown (1):
ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found
Tomasz Nowicki (1):
ACPI/table:
On 14/08/15 15:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Ok, so it's likely a memory corruption. You need to check the bound you
ara using when copying the data to the guest or from the ACPI in
general. Or maybe you just didn't allocate enough space.
But it fails at the xzalloc_bytes itself. not at copy
On 2015/8/14 22:53, Julien Grall wrote:
On 14/08/15 15:49, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Ok, so it's likely a memory corruption. You need to check the bound you
ara using when copying the data to the guest or from the ACPI in
general. Or maybe you just didn't allocate enough space.
But it fails at
On 2015/8/14 22:41, Julien Grall wrote:
On 14/08/15 15:35, Shannon Zhao wrote:
Do you copy data in the newly allocated memory between 2 xzalloc_bytes?
No, I just use xzalloc_bytes to allocate some place and copy ACPI to the
allocated place, modify the content, then call
flight 60674 xen-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60674/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-debianhvm-amd64 19 guest-start/debianhvm.repeat fail
REGR. vs. 58884
This document is going to explain the design details of Xen booting with
ACPI on ARM. Maybe parts of it may not be appropriate. Any comments are
welcome.
Changes v2-v3:
* remove the two HVM_PARAMs for grant table and let linux kernel use
xlated_setup_gnttab_pages() to setup grant table.
*
On 14.08.15 at 16:45, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
On 14/08/15 15:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
If you are thinking of Windows for ARM64, there isn't one yet. When/if
it will become available, there are going to be a number of issues to
address before we can run it as a guest on Xen on ARM
On 14/08/15 15:59, Shannon Zhao wrote:
2. Create minimal DT to pass required information to Dom0
--
The minimal DT mainly passes Dom0 bootargs, address and size of initrd
(if available), address and size of uefi system table, address and
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:19:53AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
What is the purpose of 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' test in
xc_domain_setvnuma()? Can't we have nodes with no memory?
If that's the case, this check will still miss configurations when a node
spans multiple memory ranges.
For
On 08/14/2015 11:35 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:19:53AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
What is the purpose of 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' test in
xc_domain_setvnuma()? Can't we have nodes with no memory?
If that's the case, this check will still miss configurations when a node
On Thu, 13 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 13.08.15 at 11:42, mja...@caviumnetworks.com wrote:
2.1pci_hostbridge and pci_hostbridge_ops
-
The init function in the PCI host driver calls
On 14.08.15 at 16:37, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 08:32:05AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 15:59, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 06:49:18AM -0600, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 13:52, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On
What is the purpose of 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' test in
xc_domain_setvnuma()? Can't we have nodes with no memory?
If that's the case, this check will still miss configurations when a
node spans multiple memory ranges.
For example, this fails:
vcpus = 4
vnuma = [ [
trampoline_bios_setup:
+mov %ebp,%esi
+
+/* Initialise GDT and basic data segments. */
+add %ebp,sym_offset(gdt_boot_descr_addr)(%esi)
+lgdtsym_offset(gdt_boot_descr)(%esi)
+
+mov $BOOT_DS,%ecx
+mov
On Fri, 14 Aug 2015, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 16:45, julien.gr...@citrix.com wrote:
On 14/08/15 15:37, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
If you are thinking of Windows for ARM64, there isn't one yet. When/if
it will become available, there are going to be a number of issues to
address
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:38:43AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
On 08/14/2015 11:35 AM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 11:19:53AM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
What is the purpose of 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' test in
xc_domain_setvnuma()? Can't we have nodes with no memory?
If
flight 60675 xen-4.2-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60675/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 16 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail REGR. vs.
58892
Regressions
@@ -818,10 +819,13 @@ static void xen_pt_unregister_device(PCIDevice *d)
{
XenPCIPassthroughState *s = XEN_PT_DEVICE(d);
uint8_t machine_irq = s-machine_irq;
-uint8_t intx = xen_pt_pci_intx(s);
+uint8_t intx;
int rc;
-if (machine_irq) {
+ /*
: it was clearly running rc6 not rc5.
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 51s! [swapper/0:0]
[14410.728735] Modules linked in:
[14410.728735] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.2.0-rc6-20150814-linus-doflr+ #1
[14410.728735] task: 8221a580 ti: 8220 task.ti
How about having a short discussion on Monday during Xen Summit to discuss on
the points.
We have a talk tuesday morning and I would update it based on the monday
discussion.
Regards,
Manish Jaggi
From: xen-devel-boun...@lists.xen.org
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 05:08:32PM +0300, M. Ivanov wrote:
On Thu, 2015-08-13 at 15:49 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 09:21:35PM +0300, M. Ivanov wrote:
On Mon, 2015-08-10 at 10:47 -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 05:14:28PM +0300,
3.10-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org
commit aa1acff356bbedfd03b544051f5b371746735d89 upstream.
The update_va_mapping hypercall can fail if the VA isn't present
in the guest's page tables. Under
3.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org
commit aa1acff356bbedfd03b544051f5b371746735d89 upstream.
The update_va_mapping hypercall can fail if the VA isn't present
in the guest's page tables. Under
The test for 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' in xc_domain_setvnuma() was
originally writtten with the idea that number of memory ranges would
at least be equal to number of nodes.
We may want to specify nodes with no memory, however, and thus this
check should be removed.
Signed-off-by: Boris
4.1-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Andy Lutomirski l...@kernel.org
commit aa1acff356bbedfd03b544051f5b371746735d89 upstream.
The update_va_mapping hypercall can fail if the VA isn't present
in the guest's page tables. Under
]
[14410.728735] Modules linked in:
[14410.728735] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.2.0-rc6-20150814-linus-doflr+ #1
[14410.728735] task: 8221a580 ti: 8220 task.ti:
8220
[14410.728735] RIP: e030:[8100122a] [8100122a]
xen_hypercall_xen_version
Hi Julien,
Thanks for the review.
/* Create Xen's mappings of memory.
- * Base and virt must be 32MB aligned and size a multiple of 32MB.
+ * Mapping_size must be either 2MB or 32MB.
I would have generalize the function to support any mapping size. But I'm
also fine with the current
This title should say libxc: ...
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:18:52PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
The test for 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' in xc_domain_setvnuma() was
originally writtten with the idea that number of memory ranges would
at least be equal to number of nodes.
We may want to
On 08/14/2015 12:26 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
This title should say libxc: ...
Ah, of course. Let me know if you want me to re-send it.
-boris
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:18:52PM -0400, Boris Ostrovsky wrote:
The test for 'nr_vmemranges nr_vnodes' in xc_domain_setvnuma() was
originally writtten
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 12:16 AM, Ingo Molnar mi...@kernel.org wrote:
I just sent it to Linus, so barring a catastrophy it should be upstream soon.
Well, I just rejected that pull as completely broken, so I guess the
catastrophy happened... Or, alternatively, I mis-read the code, which
does
Hi,
This is more-or-less what Julien requested. He noted that pt.contig was never
set to zero. When I looked further, I found other bits that were also never
given a value. Looking at the callsites, they almost all seem to assume a value
of zero, so that's what I went with.
Patch 1 re-orders the
Shuffle lines around so that the assignments in mfn_to_xen_entry()
occur in the same order as the bits are declared in lpae_pt_t.
This makes it easier to see which ones are never given a value.
No change in behaviour.
Also fix a minor comment typo.
Signed-off-by: Chris Brand
Hi,
This is more-or-less what Julien requested. He noted that pt.contig was never
set to zero. When I looked further, I found other bits that were also never
given a value. Looking at the callsites, they almost all seem to assume a value
of zero, so that's what I went with.
Patch 1 re-orders the
/0:0]
[ 6620.282805] Modules linked in:
[ 6620.282805] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.2.0-rc6-20150814-linus-doflr-apicrevert+ #1
[ 6620.282805] task: 8221a580 ti: 8220 task.ti:
8220
[ 6620.282805] RIP: e030:[8100122a] [8100122a
that before, because it wasn't in yet .. and likely to
fix the issue,
also pulled and compiling now.
--
Sander
NMI watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#0 stuck for 506s! [swapper/0:0]
[ 6620.282805] Modules linked in:
[ 6620.282805] CPU: 0 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted
4.2.0-rc6-20150814
On Sat, 2015-08-15 at 00:09 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
On 2015-08-13 00:41, Eric Dumazet wrote:
On Wed, 2015-08-12 at 23:46 +0200, Sander Eikelenboom wrote:
Thanks for the reminder, but luckily i was aware of that,
seen enough of your replies asking for patches to be resubmitted
Ensure that every bit has a specific value.
Reported-by: Julien Grall julien.gr...@citrix.com
Signed-off-by: Chris Brand chris.br...@broadcom.com
---
xen/include/asm-arm/page.h | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h b/xen/include/asm-arm/page.h
index
On Fri, Jul 17, 2015 at 05:03:44PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
On Thu, 2 Jul 2015, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
It should never happen, but in case it does (an developer adds
a new register and the 'init_val' expands past the register
size) we want to report. The code will only write
On 2015-08-14 01:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 14/08/15 08:13, fowlsl...@riseup.net wrote:
On the VT-d troubleshooting page, I was informed to shoot you all a
message if Xen had to deactivate my VT-d due to errors in my BIOS (in
this case Coreboot). I am running John Lewis' Coreboot ROM for the
flight 60677 linux-3.4 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60677/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 6 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 30511
Tests which are
Hi all,
That might be a dumb question but I just not confident with it. I'm not
familiar with Xen's memory management part. Currently I want to add some
support (it should cope more with machine memory) to the hyperviosr to
assist the management of the above VMs. Now the situation is there're
On 15/08/15 06:14, fowlsl...@riseup.net wrote:
On 2015-08-14 01:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 14/08/15 08:13, fowlsl...@riseup.net wrote:
On the VT-d troubleshooting page, I was informed to shoot you all a
message if Xen had to deactivate my VT-d due to errors in my BIOS
(in this case
flight 60679 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60679/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 0cd1ecea673160417e30e46009a54d361a131235
baseline version:
ovmf
On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 10:59:19PM +0800, Shannon Zhao wrote:
This document is going to explain the design details of Xen booting with
ACPI on ARM. Maybe parts of it may not be appropriate. Any comments are
welcome.
Changes v2-v3:
* remove the two HVM_PARAMs for grant table and let linux
On 14.08.15 at 12:30, rcojoc...@bitdefender.com wrote:
On 08/14/2015 01:21 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 11:54, rcojoc...@bitdefender.com wrote:
@@ -460,6 +459,18 @@ typedef enum __packed {
SMAP_CHECK_DISABLED,/* disable the check */
} smap_check_policy_t;
+/*
+ *
flight 60676 qemu-upstream-4.3-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60676/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs. 60159
Hi Shannon,
On 14/08/15 04:36, Shannon Zhao wrote:
From: Tomasz Nowicki tomasz.nowi...@linaro.org
Ported from Linux commit 4ceacd02f5a1795c5c697e0345ee10beef675290.
acpi_parse_entries() allows to traverse all available table entries (aka
subtables) by passing max_entries parameter equal
flight 37834 distros-debian-sid real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/37834/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-amd64-sid-netboot-pygrub 9 debian-di-install fail REGR. vs.
37816
Currently in ioreq server, guest write-protected ram pages are
tracked in the same rangeset with device mmio resources. Yet
unlike device mmio, which can be in big chunks, the guest write-
protected pages may be discrete ranges with 4K bytes each.
This patch uses a seperate rangeset for the guest
This patch refactors struct rangeset to base it on the red-black
tree structure, instead of on the current doubly linked list. By
now, ioreq leverages rangeset to keep track of the IO/memory
resources to be emulated. Yet when number of ranges inside one
ioreq server is very high, traversing a
XenGT leverages ioreq server to track and forward the accesses to
GPU I/O resources, e.g. the PPGTT(per-process graphic translation
tables). Currently, ioreq server uses rangeset to track the BDF/
PIO/MMIO ranges to be emulated. To select an ioreq server, the
rangeset is searched to see if the
On 14/08/15 09:31, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/13/2015 12:46 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 12/08/15 11:17, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/12/2015 01:32 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On 08/11/2015 03:45 AM, Rafal Mielniczuk wrote:
On 11/08/15 07:08, Bob Liu wrote:
On 08/10/2015 11:52 PM, Jens Axboe wrote:
On
On 14.08.15 at 13:52, daniel.ki...@oracle.com wrote:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:48:06PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:17PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
diff --git a/xen/include/asm-x86/page.h b/xen/include/asm-x86/page.h
index 87b3341..27481ac 100644
---
On 11.08.2015 16:12, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.08.15 at 16:09, mpohl...@amazon.de wrote:
Todo:
* Should be moved to sysctl to only allow Dom0 access
Because of?
The discussion in this thread:
[Xen-devel] [RFC PATCH v3.1 2/2] xsplice: Add hook for build_id
was:
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 12:56:58PM -0400, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 04:29:18PM +0200, Daniel Kiper wrote:
Add multiboot2 protocol support for relocatable images. Only GRUB2
with relevant patches understands that feature. Older multiboot
You may want to enumerate
Ouyangzhaowei (Charles) ouyangzhao...@huawei.com writes:
Hi all:
Now a days, we tested Redhat 6.2(6.4) on Xen(version 4.1.2).
If we config the cpu number more than 32, it'll show 32 in
the VM, and if we config it 64 cpus, the VM will crash and
the log is list below.
Can someone tell us
On 8/14/2015 4:46 PM, Paul Durrant wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Yu, Zhang [mailto:yu.c.zh...@linux.intel.com]
Sent: 14 August 2015 08:41
To: Paul Durrant; xen-devel@lists.xen.org; Ian Jackson; Stefano Stabellini; Ian
Campbell; Wei Liu; Keir (Xen.org); jbeul...@suse.com; Andrew
As suggested by Jan Beulich, moved struct monitor_write_data from
struct arch_domain to struct arch_vcpu, as well as moving all
vm_event-related data from asm-x86/domain.h to struct vm_event,
and allocating it dynamically only when needed.
Signed-off-by: Razvan Cojocaru rcojoc...@bitdefender.com
On 14.08.15 at 11:14, osstest-ad...@xenproject.org wrote:
flight 60673 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/60673/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
On 14.08.15 at 11:54, rcojoc...@bitdefender.com wrote:
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void hvm_do_resume(struct vcpu *v)
}
/* Inject pending hw/sw trap */
-if ( v-arch.hvm_vcpu.inject_trap.vector != -1 )
+if ( v-arch.hvm_vcpu.inject_trap.vector != -1 )
Stray whitespace change to
On 14.08.15 at 05:36, zhaoshengl...@huawei.com wrote:
From: Shannon Zhao shannon.z...@linaro.org
Len Brown (1):
ACPI: disable ACPI cleanly when bad RSDP found
Tomasz Nowicki (1):
ACPI/table: Always count matched and successfully parsed entries
These look good now, but is there a
On 08/14/2015 01:21 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 14.08.15 at 11:54, rcojoc...@bitdefender.com wrote:
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@ void hvm_do_resume(struct vcpu *v)
}
/* Inject pending hw/sw trap */
-if ( v-arch.hvm_vcpu.inject_trap.vector != -1 )
+if (
1 - 100 of 101 matches
Mail list logo
