flight 62771 xen-unstable real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62771/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 9 windows-install fail REGR. vs. 62711
In 16181cbb (tools: Honor Config.mk debug value, rather than setting our
own), configure doesn't set debug variable anymore. There is, however,
one place that was missed. The file config/Tools.mk.in was still
expecting a @debug@ value from configure. After 16181cbb that value
remained "debug :=
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:08:54PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
[...]
> there was an error in generated config/Tools.mk I solved manually (replacing
> @debug@ with y), already reported here:
> http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-10/msg01184.html
>
That one is a real bug and I've
From: >
msix->mmio is added to XenPCIPassthroughState's object as property.
object_finalize_child_property is called for XenPCIPassthroughState's
object, which calls object_property_del_all, which is going to try to
delete msix->mmio. object_finalize_child_property() will
Il 11/10/2015 16:54, Wei Liu ha scritto:
On Sat, Oct 10, 2015 at 03:08:54PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
[...]
there was an error in generated config/Tools.mk I solved manually (replacing
@debug@ with y), already reported here:
http://lists.xen.org/archives/html/xen-devel/2015-10/msg01184.html
Il 11/10/2015 16:41, Wei Liu ha scritto:
In 16181cbb (tools: Honor Config.mk debug value, rather than setting our
own), configure doesn't set debug variable anymore. There is, however,
one place that was missed. The file config/Tools.mk.in was still
expecting a @debug@ value from configure.
On Fri, Oct 09, 2015 at 05:13:20PM +0200, Fabio Fantoni wrote:
> In latest weeks building xen 4.6 with debug enable qemu trace was missed,
> today building xen 4.6.0 I found the cause.
> Even if debug ?= y in Config.mk, config/Tools.mk is not generate correctly,
> have this line:
> debug
flight 62793 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62793/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-amd64-xsm 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 62315
flight 62795 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62795/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds 11 guest-start fail like 62748
Tests which did not
flight 62780 linux-linus real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62780/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-rumpuserxen-i386 3 host-install(3) broken REGR. vs. 59254
flight 62802 xen-4.5-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62802/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which are failing intermittently (not blocking):
test-amd64-i386-xl-raw3 host-install(3) broken in 62756 pass in 62802
flight 62807 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62807/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking:
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 9 debian-di-installfail never pass
test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-qcow2 9
flight 62816 ovmf real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62816/
Perfect :-)
All tests in this flight passed
version targeted for testing:
ovmf 8145b63e975f86fad6ae09185cd228415b07c7e7
baseline version:
ovmf
This run is configured for baseline tests only.
flight 38154 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://osstest.xs.citrite.net/~osstest/testlogs/logs/38154/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-winxpsp3 9 windows-install
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:15 AM
> To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Hu, Robert ; Ian Campbell
> ; Ian Jackson
> Subject:
flight 62811 xen-4.4-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/62811/
Failures :-/ but no regressions.
Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking):
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-win7-amd64 17 guest-stop fail like 62616
Xu, Quan wrote on 2015-09-16:
> Introduction
>
>
>VT-d code currently has a number of cases where completion of
> certain operations is being waited for by way of spinning. The
> majority of instances use that variable indirectly through
> IOMMU_WAIT_OP() macro , allowing for
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:59 AM
> To: Hu, Robert
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.campb...@citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
> Jin, Gordon ; Zheng, Di
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 12:36 AM
> To: Hu, Robert
> Cc: xen-devel@lists.xen.org; ian.campb...@citrix.com; wei.l...@citrix.com;
> Jin, Gordon ; Zheng, Di
> -Original Message-
> From: Ian Jackson [mailto:ian.jack...@eu.citrix.com]
> Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2015 3:15 AM
> To: xen-de...@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: Hu, Robert ; Ian Campbell
> ; Ian Jackson ; Ian
>
20 matches
Mail list logo