Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH XTF v2 4/4] build: Avoid using initialisers for anonymous unions

2017-10-01 Thread Glenn Enright
On 29/09/17 06:10, Andrew Cooper wrote: GCC 4.4 of CentOS 6 vintage can't cope. Reported-by: Glenn Enright <gl...@rimuhosting.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper <andrew.coop...@citrix.com> --- v2: Reduce to just the anonymous parts of the union --- tests/livepatch-priv-check

[Xen-devel] Building xtf on older distros

2017-09-27 Thread Glenn Enright
Hi there When building the xen testing framework on CentOS6, I see the below issue. I see similar issues with CentOS7 and other distros with older tool chains. The only one that built cleanly for me was Ubuntu 1604. Some workarounds (disabling the -W options) let it get a bit further but I

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-05-15 Thread Glenn Enright
On 15/05/17 21:57, Juergen Gross wrote: On 13/05/17 06:02, Glenn Enright wrote: On 09/05/17 21:24, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:10:24AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: On 04/05/17 00:17, Glenn Enright wrote: On 04/05/17 04:58, Steven Haigh wrote: On 04/05/17 01:53, Juergen

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-05-12 Thread Glenn Enright
On 09/05/17 21:24, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 11:10:24AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: On 04/05/17 00:17, Glenn Enright wrote: On 04/05/17 04:58, Steven Haigh wrote: On 04/05/17 01:53, Juergen Gross wrote: On 03/05/17 12:45, Steven Haigh wrote: Just wanted to give

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-05-03 Thread Glenn Enright
On 04/05/17 04:58, Steven Haigh wrote: On 04/05/17 01:53, Juergen Gross wrote: On 03/05/17 12:45, Steven Haigh wrote: Just wanted to give this a little nudge now people seem to be back on deck... Glenn, could you please give the attached patch a try? It should be applied on top of the other

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-30 Thread Glenn Enright
On 19/04/17 22:09, Juergen Gross wrote: On 19/04/17 09:16, Roger Pau Monné wrote: On Wed, Apr 19, 2017 at 06:39:41AM +0200, Juergen Gross wrote: On 19/04/17 03:02, Glenn Enright wrote: Thanks Juergen. I applied that, to our 4.9.23 dom0 kernel, which still shows the issue. When replicating

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-18 Thread Glenn Enright
On 18/04/17 20:36, Juergen Gross wrote: On 12/04/17 00:45, Glenn Enright wrote: On 12/04/17 10:23, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 11/04/2017 23:13, Glenn Enright wrote: On 11/04/17 21:49, Dietmar Hahn wrote: Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017, 20:03:14 schrieb Glenn Enright: On 11/04/17 17:59, Juergen

[Xen-devel] valgrind support for xen4.7+

2017-04-11 Thread Glenn Enright
Hi there Has anyone seen or been working on patches for valgrind for recent versions of xen? I was trying 3.13 from SVN against xen 4.7.2 and see that support for that version is not present. Per https://blog.xenproject.org/2013/01/18/using-valgrind-to-debug-xen-toolstacks/ A starter

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-11 Thread Glenn Enright
On 12/04/17 10:23, Andrew Cooper wrote: On 11/04/2017 23:13, Glenn Enright wrote: On 11/04/17 21:49, Dietmar Hahn wrote: Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017, 20:03:14 schrieb Glenn Enright: On 11/04/17 17:59, Juergen Gross wrote: On 11/04/17 07:25, Glenn Enright wrote: Hi all We are seeing an odd

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-11 Thread Glenn Enright
On 11/04/17 21:49, Dietmar Hahn wrote: Am Dienstag, 11. April 2017, 20:03:14 schrieb Glenn Enright: On 11/04/17 17:59, Juergen Gross wrote: On 11/04/17 07:25, Glenn Enright wrote: Hi all We are seeing an odd issue with domu domains from xl destroy, under recent 4.9 kernels a (null) domain

Re: [Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-11 Thread Glenn Enright
On 11/04/17 17:59, Juergen Gross wrote: On 11/04/17 07:25, Glenn Enright wrote: Hi all We are seeing an odd issue with domu domains from xl destroy, under recent 4.9 kernels a (null) domain is left behind. I guess this is the dom0 kernel version? This has occurred on a variety of hardware

[Xen-devel] null domains after xl destroy

2017-04-10 Thread Glenn Enright
Hi all We are seeing an odd issue with domu domains from xl destroy, under recent 4.9 kernels a (null) domain is left behind. This has occurred on a variety of hardware, with no obvious commonality. 4.4.55 does not show this behavior. On my test machine I have the following packages