Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd

2016-02-22 Thread Ross Philipson
On 02/19/2016 12:12 PM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd"): >> On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 12:05 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: >>> On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: >>>> It ha

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd

2016-02-19 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Campbell writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd"): > On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 12:05 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > > It has four instances of the same CID 1198719 (strncpy(.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd

2016-02-18 Thread Ian Campbell
On Wed, 2016-02-17 at 12:05 -0500, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > > It has four instances of the same CID 1198719 (strncpy(..., 32) into a > > 32-byte buffer). > > > > However ever since it was checked in in 2008 it has contained a >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd

2016-02-17 Thread Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 02:41:14PM +, Ian Campbell wrote: > It has four instances of the same CID 1198719 (strncpy(..., 32) into a > 32-byte buffer). > > However ever since it was checked in in 2008 it has contained a > /tmp instead of the real ones in /proc. I therefore conclude that it > has

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] tools: remove xenpmd

2016-02-17 Thread Ian Campbell
It has four instances of the same CID 1198719 (strncpy(..., 32) into a 32-byte buffer). However ever since it was checked in in 2008 it has contained a /tmp instead of the real ones in /proc. I therefore conclude that it has not ever been used in its current form in the last 8 years and might as w