On 06/04/2015 10:56 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
Razvan Cojocaru rcojoc...@bitdefender.com 06/04/15 3:46 PM
On 06/04/2015 04:43 PM, Tim Deegan wrote:
At 14:40 +0100 on 04 Jun (1433428815), Tim Deegan wrote:
At 16:45 +0300 on 29 May (1432917959), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew
Razvan Cojocaru rcojoc...@bitdefender.com 06/04/15 3:46 PM
On 06/04/2015 04:43 PM, Tim Deegan wrote:
At 14:40 +0100 on 04 Jun (1433428815), Tim Deegan wrote:
At 16:45 +0300 on 29 May (1432917959), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some
At 16:45 +0300 on 29 May (1432917959), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
VM_EVENT_REASON_WRITE_CTRLREG vm_event type,
At 14:40 +0100 on 04 Jun (1433428815), Tim Deegan wrote:
At 16:45 +0300 on 29 May (1432917959), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by
On 06/04/2015 04:43 PM, Tim Deegan wrote:
At 14:40 +0100 on 04 Jun (1433428815), Tim Deegan wrote:
At 16:45 +0300 on 29 May (1432917959), Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:45 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
VM_EVENT_REASON_WRITE_CTRLREG vm_event type,
On 02/06/15 16:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:45 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
On 06/02/2015 06:39 PM, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:45 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
On Tue, 2015-06-02 at 16:43 +0100, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/06/15 16:39, Ian Campbell wrote:
On Fri, 2015-05-29 at 16:45 +0300, Razvan Cojocaru wrote:
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new
From: Razvan Cojocaru [mailto:rcojoc...@bitdefender.com]
Sent: Friday, May 29, 2015 9:46 PM
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
As suggested by Andrew Cooper, this patch attempts to remove
some redundancy and allow for an easier time when adding vm_events
for new control registers in the future, by having a single
VM_EVENT_REASON_WRITE_CTRLREG vm_event type, meant to serve CR0,
CR3, CR4 and (newly introduced) XCR0. The
11 matches
Mail list logo
