Re: [Xen-devel] Outreachy golang bindings planning

2016-11-14 Thread Ronald Rojas
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 12:42:52PM +, Lars Kurth wrote: > Ronald, > I am not sure whether you checked the Outreachy page and apologies for > getting back late, but this project has been accepted. Let me know of your > own blog and whether you'd be willing to write a guest blog or let me

Re: [Xen-devel] Outreachy golang bindings planning

2016-11-11 Thread Lars Kurth
Ronald, I am not sure whether you checked the Outreachy page and apologies for getting back late, but this project has been accepted. Let me know of your own blog and whether you'd be willing to write a guest blog or let me cover a quick blog on blog.xenproject.org as an introduction to the

Re: [Xen-devel] Outreachy golang bindings planning

2016-10-17 Thread Ronald Rojas
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:49:18PM +0100, George Dunlap wrote: > Hey Ronald, > > My ultimate vision for the libxl golang project is to have the following: > > - Golang bindings for all core libxl functionality > - A test program which exersises as much of that functionality as is > reasonable >

[Xen-devel] Outreachy golang bindings planning

2016-10-12 Thread George Dunlap
Hey Ronald, My ultimate vision for the libxl golang project is to have the following: - Golang bindings for all core libxl functionality - A test program which exersises as much of that functionality as is reasonable The C libxl library has two components: parts that are written by hand (such