RE: [PATCH V3 07/10] xen: re-define assign_pages and introduce assign_page

2021-07-20 Thread Penny Zheng
Hi Jan > -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 4:41 PM > To: Penny Zheng ; jul...@xen.org > Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen > ; nd ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 07/10] xen: re-define assign_pages and

[qemu-mainline test] 163849: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163849 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163849/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.

[ovmf test] 163851: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163851 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163851/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359

Nested Virtualization of Hyper-V on Xen Not Working

2021-07-20 Thread Xentrigued
RATIONALE: Features in recent versions of Windows now REQUIRE Hyper-V support to work. In particular, Windows Containers, Sandbox, Docker Desktop and the Windows Subsystem for Linux version 2 (WSL2). Running Windows in a VM as a development and test platform is currently a common requirement for

Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] bus: Make remove callback return void

2021-07-20 Thread Wolfram Sang
On Tue, Jul 13, 2021 at 09:35:22PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > The driver core ignores the return value of this callback because there > is only little it can do when a device disappears. > > This is the final bit of a long lasting cleanup quest where several > buses were converted to also

RE: [PATCH V3 05/10] xen/arm: static memory initialization

2021-07-20 Thread Penny Zheng
Hi Jan > -Original Message- > From: Jan Beulich > Sent: Monday, July 19, 2021 4:20 PM > To: Penny Zheng > Cc: Bertrand Marquis ; Wei Chen > ; nd ; xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org; > sstabell...@kernel.org; jul...@xen.org > Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 05/10] xen/arm: static memory

[linux-5.4 test] 163844: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163844 linux-5.4 real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163844/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Regressions which are regarded as allowable (not blocking): test-armhf-armhf-xl-rtds18 guest-start/debian.repeat fail REGR. vs. 163800 Tests which did not succeed,

[xen-unstable-smoke test] 163853: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163853 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163853/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 15 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm

5.10.40 dom0 kernel - nvme: Invalid SGL for payload:131072 nents:13

2021-07-20 Thread Andy Smith
Hi, I have a Debian 10 (buster/stable) dom0 running hypervisor 4.14.2. For almost 2 years it's been using the packaged Debian stable kernel which is 4.19.x. Last night I upgraded the kernel to the buster-backports package which is based on 5.10.40 and about 4 hours later got this: Jul 20

[linux-linus test] 163841: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163841 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163841/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332

Re: [PATCH v3] xen/arm64: Remove READ/WRITE_SYSREG32 helper macros

2021-07-20 Thread Stefano Stabellini
On Mon, 12 Jul 2021, Michal Orzel wrote: > AArch64 system registers are 64bit whereas AArch32 ones > are 32bit or 64bit. MSR/MRS are expecting 64bit values thus > we should get rid of helpers READ/WRITE_SYSREG32 > in favour of using READ/WRITE_SYSREG. > > The last place in code making use of

Re: [PATCH RESEND 0/2] gitlab-ci: add a qemu-based arm32 test

2021-07-20 Thread Stefano Stabellini
Re-ping? On Tue, 13 Jul 2021, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > Hi all, > > This short series adds a minimal ARM32 test based on QEMU. It just runs > Xen and Dom0 up to a Busybox prompt. > > Cheers, > > Stefano > > > Stefano Stabellini (2): > Add qemu-system-arm to the existing

[ovmf test] 163835: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163835 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163835/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359

[PATCH] tools/xl: Add stubdomain_cmdline option to xl.cfg

2021-07-20 Thread Scott Davis
This adds an option to the xl domain configuration file syntax for specifying a kernel command line for device-model stubdomains. It is intended for use with Linux-based stubdomains. Signed-off-by: Scott Davis --- docs/man/xl.cfg.5.pod.in | 4

[qemu-mainline test] 163834: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163834 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163834/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs.

Re: [PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result

2021-07-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Andrew Cooper writes ("Re: [PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result"): > On 20/07/2021 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote: > > fixed this (with slightly different style, and despite not mentioning > > this change in the commit message) > > ?  Literally half of the commit message pertains to this failure.

[xen-unstable test] 163832: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163832 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163832/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemut-win7-amd64 19 guest-stopfail like 163458 test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-amd

Re: [PATCH v1] automation: collect log files in subdirectories

2021-07-20 Thread Anthony PERARD
On Fri, Jul 16, 2021 at 04:41:57PM +0200, Olaf Hering wrote: > Am Fri, 16 Jul 2021 15:28:43 +0100 > schrieb Anthony PERARD : > > > Actually, it's possible to delete the repo. > > Navigate to the repo you want to delete ( > > https://gitlab.com/xen-project/people/olafhering ) > > then in the

Re: [PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result

2021-07-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 20/07/2021 15:31, Ian Jackson wrote: > Jason Andryuk writes ("[PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result"): >> Compiling xs-test.c on Ubuntu 21.04 fails with: > Thanks. However, your patch doesn't apply to staging; the files have > been reorganised AFAICT. Also, I think > >

Re: [PATCH] x86/hvm: Propagate real error information up through hvm_load()

2021-07-20 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 19/07/2021 13:46, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 19.07.2021 13:14, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> hvm_load() is currently a mix of -errno and -1 style error handling, which >> aliases -EPERM. This leads to the following confusing diagnostics: >> >> From userspace: >> xc: info: Restoring domain >> xc:

Re: [PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result

2021-07-20 Thread Jason Andryuk
On Tue, Jul 20, 2021 at 10:31 AM Ian Jackson wrote: > > Jason Andryuk writes ("[PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result"): > > Compiling xs-test.c on Ubuntu 21.04 fails with: > > Thanks. However, your patch doesn't apply to staging; the files have > been reorganised AFAICT. Also, I think > >

Re: [PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result

2021-07-20 Thread Ian Jackson
Jason Andryuk writes ("[PATCH] tests/xs: Check asprintf result"): > Compiling xs-test.c on Ubuntu 21.04 fails with: Thanks. However, your patch doesn't apply to staging; the files have been reorganised AFAICT. Also, I think 93c9edbef51b31056f93a37a778326c90a83158c tests/xenstore: Rework

Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V4 09/13] x86/Swiotlb/HV: Add Swiotlb bounce buffer remap function for HV IVM

2021-07-20 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Please split the swiotlb changes into a separate patch from the consumer. > } > + > +/* > + * hv_map_memory - map memory to extra space in the AMD SEV-SNP Isolation VM. > + */ > +unsigned long hv_map_memory(unsigned long addr, unsigned long size) > +{ > + unsigned long *pfns = kcalloc(size

[qemu-mainline bisection] complete test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
branch xen-unstable xenbranch xen-unstable job test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 testid debian-hvm-install Tree: linux git://xenbits.xen.org/linux-pvops.git Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git Tree: ovmf git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/ovmf.git Tree: qemu

[linux-linus test] 163824: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163824 linux-linus real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163824/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-qemut-rhel6hvm-intel 7 xen-install fail REGR. vs. 152332

Re: [Resend RFC PATCH V4 09/13] x86/Swiotlb/HV: Add Swiotlb bounce buffer remap function for HV IVM

2021-07-20 Thread Tianyu Lan
Hi Christoph & Konrad: Could you review this patch and make sure this is right way to resolve the memory remap request from AMD SEV-SNP vTOM case? Thanks. On 7/7/2021 11:46 PM, Tianyu Lan wrote: From: Tianyu Lan In Isolation VM with AMD SEV, bounce buffer needs to be accessed via

[libvirt test] 163829: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163829 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163829/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-arm64-libvirt 6 libvirt-buildfail REGR. vs. 151777 build-armhf-libvirt

[ovmf test] 163819: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163819 ovmf real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163819/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-ovmf-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 162359

[qemu-mainline test] 163811: regressions - FAIL

2021-07-20 Thread osstest service owner
flight 163811 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/163811/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-xl-qemuu-debianhvm-amd64 12 debian-hvm-install fail REGR. vs. 163321