On 02/05/2025 8:01 am, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 01.05.2025 14:23, Gerald Elder-Vass wrote:
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
>> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ obj-y += percpu.o
>> obj-y += physdev.o
>> obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += x86_64/physdev.o
>> obj-y += psr.o
>> +obj-y += sbat.o
>
On 01.05.2025 14:23, Gerald Elder-Vass wrote:
> --- a/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/Makefile
> @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ obj-y += percpu.o
> obj-y += physdev.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_COMPAT) += x86_64/physdev.o
> obj-y += psr.o
> +obj-y += sbat.o
> obj-y += setup.o
> obj-y += shutdown.o
> obj-y
On Thu, May 1, 2025 at 1:23 PM Gerald Elder-Vass
wrote:
>
> SBAT is a revocation scheme for UEFI SecureBoot, and is mandated by Microsoft
> for signing.
>
> The SBAT section provides a way for the binary to declare a generation
> id for its upstream source and any vendor changes applied. A compati
SBAT is a revocation scheme for UEFI SecureBoot, and is mandated by Microsoft
for signing.
The SBAT section provides a way for the binary to declare a generation
id for its upstream source and any vendor changes applied. A compatible
loader can then revoke vulnerable binaries by generation, using