>>> On 07.01.19 at 13:14, wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:51:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
>> >>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, wrote:
>> > passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86
>> > maintainership.
>>
>> It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ...
>>
On Mon, Jan 07, 2019 at 02:51:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, wrote:
> > passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86
> > maintainership.
>
> It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ...
>
> > --- a/MAINTAINERS
> > +++
>>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, wrote:
> passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86
> maintainership.
It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ...
> --- a/MAINTAINERS
> +++ b/MAINTAINERS
> @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ F:xen/drivers/passthrough/
> X: