>>> On 04.01.19 at 11:33, <roger....@citrix.com> wrote: > passthrough/x86 is tied to the x86 code, and as such put it under x86 > maintainership.
It is tied to both, so at the very least I object to ... > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@ -257,6 +257,7 @@ F: xen/drivers/passthrough/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/amd/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/arm/ > X: xen/drivers/passthrough/vtd/ > +X: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ ... this; the Arm entry here is questionable too, imo. > @@ -445,6 +446,7 @@ R: Roger Pau Monné <roger....@citrix.com> > S: Supported > L: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org > F: xen/arch/x86/ > +F: xen/drivers/passthrough/x86/ This one's debatable. Jan _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org https://lists.xenproject.org/mailman/listinfo/xen-devel
