If you are working on commercial, academic or open-source projects which use
OpenXT, Xen Project or OpenEmbedded to implement platform components with
well-defined security properties, you are invited to present at Platform
Security Summit 2018, which will take place on May 23-24 in Fairfax,
flight 120391 xen-4.8-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120391/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-xtf-amd64-amd64-5 50 xtf/test-hvm64-lbr-tsx-vmentry fail REGR. vs. 120116
Tests which
On 10 March 2018 at 23:23, Manish Jaggi wrote:
> Hi Sameer,
>
>
>
> On 02/09/2018 08:40 AM, Sameer Goel wrote:
>>
>> This driver follows an approach similar to smmu driver. The intent here
>> is to reuse as much Linux code as possible.
>> - Glue code has been introduced
Hi Stefano,
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 05:09:20PM -0800, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
>On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Julien Grall wrote:
>> Furthermore, the workaround is not in Linux upstream and I doubt this will be
>> accepted as it is. So I am not convinced that we should modify Xen interface
>> for that.
>>
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 02:40:25PM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>Hi,
>
>On 09/03/18 13:30, Peng Fan wrote:
>>Hi Julien,
>>On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 10:22:09AM +, Julien Grall wrote:
>>>Hi Peng,
>>>
>>>On 09/03/18 09:05, Peng Fan wrote:
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 03:13:50PM +, Julien Grall
flight 120385 xen-4.9-testing real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120385/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-armhf 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 12
branch xen-unstable
xenbranch xen-unstable
job build-arm64-pvops
testid kernel-build
Tree: linux
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
Tree: linuxfirmware git://xenbits.xen.org/osstest/linux-firmware.git
*** Found and reproduced problem changeset ***
Bug is in
flight 120393 seabios real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120393/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-ws16-amd64 17 guest-stop fail REGR. vs. 115539
Tests which did not
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 12:07:21PM +, Ian Jackson wrote:
> > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen: defer call to xen_restrict
> > until just before os_setup_post"):
> > > Eduardo Habkost writes ("Re: [PATCH 03/11] xen: defer call to
> > >
Hi,
sorry for the long latency.
On Wed, 07 Mar 2018 09:49:24 +0100,
Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
>
> > Suppose that we negotiate from the frontend to the backend like
> >
> > int query_hw_param(int parm, int *min_p, int *max_p);
> >
> > so that you can call like
> > err =
reping
On Mon, 5 Mar 2018, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> ping?
>
> On Tue, 27 Feb 2018, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > Add pvcalls support to libxl and xl. Create the appropriate pvcalls
> > entries in xenstore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Stefano Stabellini
> >
> > diff --git
On Wed, 7 Mar 2018, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >>> On 06.03.18 at 20:24, wrote:
> > On Tue, 6 Mar 2018, Jan Beulich wrote:
> >> these stable releases should go out before the end of the month.
> >> Please point out backport candidates you find missing from the
> >> respective
On Fri, 9 Mar 2018, George Dunlap wrote:
> All this information is now covered in SUPPORT.md.
>
> Most of the emulated hardware is obvious a couple of the items are
> worth pointing out specifically.
>
> "xen_disk" is listed under "Blkback"
>
> "...the PCI host bridge and the PIIX3 chipset...":
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
The share_xen_page_with_guest() functions are used by common code, and are
implemented the same by each arch. Move the declarations into the common mm.h
rather than duplicating them in each arch/mm.h
Turn an int readonly into a boolean
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
In future patches, the structure will be extended with further information,
and this is far cleaner than adding extra parameters.
One minor tweak is that the setting of guest_type needs to be deferred until
config is known-good to
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
At the moment, there is a tight coupling between the domid and the use of
DOMCRF_dummy. Instead of using DOMCRF_dummy, base the one relevent decision
NIT: s/relevent/relevant/
on domid alone.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
Hi Andre,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
With DOMCRF_dummy removed, all remaining DOMCRF_* idenitcally match their
NIT: s/idenitcally/identically/
DOMCTL counterparts. Avoid having a conversion between two different bit
layouts, and use the DOMCTL_CDF_* constants everywhere.
Hi Andrew,
On 03/09/2018 01:18 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
ARM guests are HVM and have hardware assisted paging. There are no PV guests
or shadow paging, and all other creation flags are x86 specific.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper
---
CC: Stefano Stabellini
Hi,
On 03/09/2018 05:33 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:41:54AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 15:18, wrote:
On 02/03/18 15:34, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 21.02.18 at 15:02, wrote:
@@ -95,11 +101,18 @@ static unsigned int
Hi Wei,
On 03/09/2018 05:29 PM, Wei Liu wrote:
On Mon, Mar 05, 2018 at 07:38:36AM -0700, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 15:11, wrote:
On 05/03/18 14:00, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 05.03.18 at 14:43, wrote:
Anyway, I don't have much knowledge on
Hi Juergen,
On 03/02/2018 05:25 PM, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 02/03/18 18:09, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:05, Juergen Gross wrote:
On 02/03/18 17:51, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:25, wrote:
On 02/03/18 16:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 02.03.18 at 17:04,
Hi,
On 03/10/2018 04:44 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
This patch adds driver for UART controller found on Armada 3700 SoC.
OOI, do you have any plan for adding earlyprintk support for that platform?
There is no reference manuals available for 3700 SoC in public and this
driver is derived by
Hi Amit,
On 03/10/2018 04:44 PM, Amit Singh Tomar wrote:
This patch-set is an attempt to enable XEN on ESPRESSObin[1] based on
Marvell's ARMADA 3700 SoC
Thank you for adding support to boot Xen on that board!
Would you mind creating a page on Xen wiki to explain how to boot Xen on
that
flight 120378 libvirt real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120378/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-i386-libvirt-xsm 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 120326
Tests which did not
> -Original Message-
> From: George Dunlap [mailto:george.dun...@citrix.com]
> Sent: 09 March 2018 18:04
> To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org
> Cc: George Dunlap ; Ian Jackson
> ; Wei Liu ; Andrew Cooper
>
flight 120376 qemu-mainline real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120376/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
test-amd64-amd64-qemuu-nested-intel 14 xen-boot/l1 fail REGR. vs. 120095
flight 120380 linux-4.1 real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120380/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-arm64-pvops 6 kernel-build fail REGR. vs. 118294
build-i386-pvops
flight 120388 rumprun real [real]
http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/120388/
Regressions :-(
Tests which did not succeed and are blocking,
including tests which could not be run:
build-i386-rumprun6 rumprun-buildfail REGR. vs. 106754
build-amd64-rumprun
28 matches
Mail list logo