Re: [Xen-devel] bug: unable to LZ4 decompress ub1910 installer kernel when launching domU

2019-12-03 Thread Jeremi Piotrowski
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 09:02:18AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 01.12.2019 18:47, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 23.10.2019 22:33, Pry Mar wrote: > >>> Hello xen-devel, > >>> > >>> https://paste.debian.net/plain/1109374 > >>> >

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.13-testing test] 144509: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144509 xen-4.13-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144509/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim12 guest-start fail never pass test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13

[Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Igor Druzhinin
If the feature is not present Xen will try to force X86_BUG_FPU_PTRS feature at CPU identification time. This is especially noticeable in PV-shim that usually hotplugs its vCPUs. We either need to restrict this action for boot CPU only or allow secondary CPUs to modify forced CPU capabilities at

[Xen-devel] [qemu-mainline test] 144507: regressions - FAIL

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144507 qemu-mainline real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144507/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: test-amd64-i386-freebsd10-amd64 7 xen-boot fail REGR. vs. 144495 Tests which did

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/svm: Fix handling of EFLAGS.RF on task switch

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
VT-x updates RF before vmexit, so eflags written into the outgoing TSS happens to be correct. SVM does not update RF before vmexit, and instead provides it via a bit in exitinfo2. In practice, needing RF set in the outgoing state occurs when a task gate is used to handle faults. Extend

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 144503: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144503 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144503/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 144497

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 144505: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144505 xen-4.11-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144505/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-qemuu-dmrestrict-amd64-dmrestrict 10 debian-hvm-install fail never pass

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 > --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > +++ b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct vm_event_debug { > uint32_t insn_length; > uint8_t type;/*

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:23 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 18:16, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Andrew Cooper > > wrote: > >> On 03/12/2019 18:05, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/blkback: Avoid unmapping unmapped grant pages

2019-12-03 Thread Jens Axboe
On 11/26/19 8:36 AM, SeongJae Park wrote: From: SeongJae Park For each I/O request, blkback first maps the foreign pages for the request to its local pages. If an allocation of a local page for the mapping fails, it should unmap every mapping already made for the request. However, blkback's

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 18:05, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > >> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > >> index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 > >> --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > >> +++

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:31 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 18:24, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:22 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:18 PM Andrew Cooper > >> wrote: > >>> On 03/12/2019 18:09, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:18 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 18:09, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > >>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > >>> index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 > >>> ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:23 PM Andrew Cooper wrote: > > On 03/12/2019 18:16, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Andrew Cooper > > wrote: > >> On 03/12/2019 18:05, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 18:24, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:22 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:18 PM Andrew Cooper >> wrote: >>> On 03/12/2019 18:09, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> diff --git

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:22 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:18 PM Andrew Cooper > wrote: > > > > On 03/12/2019 18:09, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tamas K Lengyel > > > wrote: > > >>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 18:16, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:09 PM Andrew Cooper > wrote: >> On 03/12/2019 18:05, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Tamas K Lengyel
On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > > > diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 > > --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > +++ b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h > > @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 18:09, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: > On Tue, Dec 3, 2019 at 1:05 PM Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >>> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >>> index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 >>> --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >>> +++

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 01/22] golang/xenlight: generate enum types from IDL

2019-12-03 Thread George Dunlap
> On Nov 15, 2019, at 7:44 PM, Nick Rosbrook wrote: > > From: Nick Rosbrook > > Introduce gengotypes.py to generate Go code the from IDL. As a first step, > implement 'enum' type generation. > > As a result of the newly-generated code, remove the existing, and now > conflicting definitions

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 18:05, Tamas K Lengyel wrote: >> diff --git a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >> index 959083d8c4..76676ff4c0 100644 >> --- a/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >> +++ b/xen/include/public/vm_event.h >> @@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ struct vm_event_debug { >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] xen/arm: remove physical timer offset

2019-12-03 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 26/11/2019 21:13, Jeff Kubascik wrote: The physical timer traps apply an offset so that time starts at 0 for the guest. However, this offset is not currently applied to the physical counter. Per the ARMv8 Reference Manual (ARM DDI 0487E.a), section D11.2.4 Timers, the "Offset" between

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 144511: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144511 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144511/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.14 and future work

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 09:03, Durrant, Paul wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of >> Andrew Cooper >> Sent: 02 December 2019 19:52 >> To: Xen-devel List >> Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.14 and future work >> >> Hello, >> >> Now that 4.13 is on its way out of the door, it is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/8] x86: be more verbose when running on a hypervisor

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 05:09:43PM +, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 05:58:28PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > On 03.12.2019 17:37, Wei Liu wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:54:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > > >> On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > >>> Also replace

[Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86/debug: Plumb pending_dbg through the monitor and devicemodel interfaces

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
Like %cr2 for pagefaults, %dr6 contains ancillary information for debug exceptions, and needs similar handling. For xendevicemodel_inject_event(), no ABI change is needed (although an API one would be ideal). Switch from 'cr2' to 'extra' in variable names which don't constitute an API change,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/8] x86: be more verbose when running on a hypervisor

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 05:58:28PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 03.12.2019 17:37, Wei Liu wrote: > > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:54:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > >> On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > >>> Also replace reference to xen_guest. > >>> > >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > >> > >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/8] x86: be more verbose when running on a hypervisor

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 17:37, Wei Liu wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:54:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: >>> Also replace reference to xen_guest. >>> >>> Signed-off-by: Wei Liu >> >> Acked-by: Jan Beulich > > Thanks. > >> >> However, ... >> >>> ---

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 8/8] x86: introduce CONFIG_HYPERV and detection code

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Sat, Nov 30, 2019 at 11:57:37AM +, Wei Liu wrote: [...] > + */ > +#include > + > +#include > + > +static const struct hypervisor_ops hyperv_ops = { Since xg_ops has lost its xg_ prefix, I also take the liberty to drop the hyperv_ prefix here to make things more consistent. Wei.

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Basic support for sunxi/sun50i h6 platform.

2019-12-03 Thread Julien Grall
On 03/12/2019 14:38, Andre Przywara wrote: On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:39:58 + Julien Grall wrote: Hi, (+Andre) Hi, @Andre, IIRC you originally added the support for sunxi in Xen. Could you have a look at this patch? Looks alright, and indeed the H6 needs it. Even though Allwinner

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/8] x86: be more verbose when running on a hypervisor

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:54:35PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > Also replace reference to xen_guest. > > > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich Thanks. > > However, ... > > > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 6/8] x86: switch xen guest implementation to use hypervisor framework

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:52:47PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu > > Acked-by: Jan Beulich > again with one more remark: > > > @@ -326,6 +310,31 @@ void hypervisor_resume(void) > > pv_console_init(); > > } > > > > +static

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 4/8] x86: introduce hypervisor framework

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 03:49:33PM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > > We will soon implement Hyper-V support for Xen. Add a framework for > > that. > > > > This requires moving some of the hypervisor_* functions from xen.h to > > hypervisor.h. > > > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 4/4] x86/apic: allow enabling x2APIC mode regardless of interrupt remapping

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.11.2019 12:28, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/apic.c > @@ -492,7 +492,8 @@ static void __enable_x2apic(void) > > static void resume_x2apic(void) > { > -iommu_enable_x2apic(); > +if ( iommu_supports_x2apic() ) > +

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 3/4] x86/smp: check APIC ID on AP bringup

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.11.2019 12:28, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/smpboot.c > @@ -1317,6 +1317,13 @@ int __cpu_up(unsigned int cpu) > if ( (apicid = x86_cpu_to_apicid[cpu]) == BAD_APICID ) > return -ENODEV; > > +if ( (!x2apic_enabled ||

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen-pciback: optionally allow interrupt enable flag writes

2019-12-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 06:41:56AM +0100, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > QEMU running in a stubdom needs to be able to set INTX_DISABLE, and the > MSI(-X) enable flags in the PCI config space. This adds an attribute > 'allow_interrupt_control' which when set for a PCI device allows writes >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 2/4] x86/apic: force phys mode if interrupt remapping is disabled

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.11.2019 12:38, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 12:28:49PM +0100, Roger Pau Monne wrote: >> Cluster mode can only be used with interrupt remapping support, since >> the top 16bits of the APIC ID are filled with the cluster ID, and >> hence on systems where the physical ID is

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 1/4] x86/ioapic: only use dest32 with x2apic and interrupt remapping enabled

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.11.2019 12:28, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/io_apic.c > @@ -562,7 +562,7 @@ set_ioapic_affinity_irq(struct irq_desc *desc, const > cpumask_t *mask) > > dest = set_desc_affinity(desc, mask); > if (dest != BAD_APICID) { > -if (

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable-smoke test] 144508: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144508 xen-unstable-smoke real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144508/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-arm64-arm64-xl-xsm

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 7/8] x86: be more verbose when running on a hypervisor

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > Also replace reference to xen_guest. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu Acked-by: Jan Beulich However, ... > --- a/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/setup.c > @@ -700,6 +700,7 @@ void __init noreturn __start_xen(unsigned long mbi_p) >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 6/8] x86: switch xen guest implementation to use hypervisor framework

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu Acked-by: Jan Beulich again with one more remark: > @@ -326,6 +310,31 @@ void hypervisor_resume(void) > pv_console_init(); > } > > +static const struct hypervisor_ops xg_ops = { Along with other static variable not

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v5 4/8] x86: introduce hypervisor framework

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 30.11.2019 12:57, Wei Liu wrote: > We will soon implement Hyper-V support for Xen. Add a framework for > that. > > This requires moving some of the hypervisor_* functions from xen.h to > hypervisor.h. > > Signed-off-by: Wei Liu Acked-by: Jan Beulich with one more adjustment (sorry for

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 15:41, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > On 03/12/2019 14:28, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 03.12.2019 15:21, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >>> On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Igor Druzhinin
On 03/12/2019 14:28, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 03.12.2019 15:21, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >> On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >>> On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Basic support for sunxi/sun50i h6 platform.

2019-12-03 Thread Andre Przywara
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 11:39:58 + Julien Grall wrote: Hi, > (+Andre) > > Hi, > > @Andre, IIRC you originally added the support for sunxi in Xen. Could > you have a look at this patch? Looks alright, and indeed the H6 needs it. Even though Allwinner totally re-arranged the memory map, they

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/blkback: Avoid unmapping unmapped grant pages

2019-12-03 Thread sjpark
On 27.11.19 10:13, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Nov 26, 2019 at 04:36:05PM +0100, SeongJae Park wrote: >> From: SeongJae Park >> >> For each I/O request, blkback first maps the foreign pages for the >> request to its local pages. If an allocation of a local page for the >> mapping fails, it

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 15:21, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; >>> >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] [RFC XEN PATCH v3 08/11] xen: arm: vgic: don't fail if IRQ is already connected

2019-12-03 Thread Julien Grall
Hi, On 15/11/2019 20:10, Stewart Hildebrand wrote: There are some IRQs that happen to have multiple "interrupts = < ... >;" properties with the same IRQ in the device tree. For example: interrupts = <0 123 4>, <0 123 4>, <0 123 4>, <0 123 4>,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Igor Druzhinin
On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; >> >> DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, full_gdt_loaded); >> >> -void __init

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 15:11, Andrew Cooper wrote: > On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >>> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; >>> >>> DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool,

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; >> >> DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, full_gdt_loaded); >> >> -void __init

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Igor Druzhinin
On 03/12/2019 10:08, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: >> --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c >> @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; >> >> DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, full_gdt_loaded); >> >> -void __init

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] automation: improve tests

2019-12-03 Thread Jürgen Groß
On 03.12.19 11:33, Roger Pau Monne wrote: Hello, Small series to improve the automated tests, first patch enables Xen console timestamps and the second one increases the test timeout to 30s since the clang PVH tests already takes ~10s without taking into account the time to initialize QEMU.

[Xen-devel] [libvirt test] 144501: tolerable all pass - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144501 libvirt real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144501/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-armhf-armhf-libvirt 14 saverestore-support-checkfail like 144408 test-armhf-armhf-libvirt-raw 13

[Xen-devel] Xen 4.11.3 released

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
All, I am pleased to announce the release of Xen 4.11.3. This is available immediately from its git repository http://xenbits.xen.org/gitweb/?p=xen.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/stable-4.11 (tag RELEASE-4.11.3) or from the XenProject download page

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.13-testing test] 144500: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144500 xen-4.13-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144500/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-libvirt 13 migrate-support-checkfail never pass test-amd64-i386-xl-pvshim12

Re: [Xen-devel] Community Call: Call for Agenda Items and call details for Thursday Dec 5, 16:00 - 17:00 UTC

2019-12-03 Thread Lars Kurth
Correction: the meeting is this Thursday, the 5th Apologies for the typo Lars On 02/12/2019, 20:05, "Lars Kurth" wrote: Dear community members, please send me agenda items for this Friday’s community call (sorry for the late notice, I was on PTO last week). A draft agenda is at

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/arm: Basic support for sunxi/sun50i h6 platform.

2019-12-03 Thread Julien Grall
(+Andre) Hi, @Andre, IIRC you originally added the support for sunxi in Xen. Could you have a look at this patch? Cheers, On 02/12/2019 08:49, Yangtao Li wrote: adding compatible strings for h6 SoCs, Specifically orangepi3. Signed-off-by: Yangtao Li --- > xen/arch/arm/platforms/sunxi.c

Re: [Xen-devel] Community Call: Call for Agenda Items and call details for Dec 4, 16:00 - 17:00 UTC

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 03:05, Lars Kurth wrote: > Dear community members, >   > please send me agenda items for this Friday’s community call (sorry > for the late notice, I was on PTO last week). A draft agenda is at > https://cryptpad.fr/pad/#/2/pad/edit/PCtBphoXkCTiXABJ8cdL0KuZ/ I'm confused: The title

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] automation: add timestamps to Xen tests

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 10:35, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > Enable Xen timestamps in the automated Xen tests, this is helpful in > order to figure out if Xen is stuck or just slow in the automated > tests. > > Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné Acked-by: Wei Liu

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] automation: increase tests maximum time from 10s to 30s

2019-12-03 Thread Wei Liu
On Tue, 3 Dec 2019 at 10:34, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > 10s is too low for the clang tests, this is the output from a clang > test: > > (XEN) [6.512748] *** > (XEN) [6.513323] SELFTEST FAILURE: CORRECT BEHAVIOR CANNOT BE GUARANTEED > (XEN) [

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86: re-order clang no integrated assembler tests

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 12:04, Roger Pau Monné wrote: > On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:03:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: >> Furthermore I think this moving around of logic (which imo >> would better remain at the bottom of the file, well out of >> sight) is only the second best solution to the issue. The >>

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86: re-order clang no integrated assembler tests

2019-12-03 Thread Roger Pau Monné
On Tue, Dec 03, 2019 at 11:03:31AM +0100, Jan Beulich wrote: > On 02.12.2019 12:29, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > > The tests to check whether the integrated assembler is capable of > > building Xen should be performed before testing any assembler > > features, or else the feature specific tests would

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v1] xen-pciback: optionally allow interrupt enable flag writes

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 03.12.2019 06:41, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > @@ -117,6 +118,35 @@ static int command_write(struct pci_dev *dev, int > offset, u16 value, void *data) > pci_clear_mwi(dev); > } > > + if (dev_data && dev_data->allow_interrupt_control) { > + if

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] automation: improve tests

2019-12-03 Thread Andrew Cooper
On 03/12/2019 10:33, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > Hello, > > Small series to improve the automated tests, first patch enables Xen > console timestamps and the second one increases the test timeout to 30s > since the clang PVH tests already takes ~10s without taking into account > the time to

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 1/2] automation: add timestamps to Xen tests

2019-12-03 Thread Roger Pau Monne
Enable Xen timestamps in the automated Xen tests, this is helpful in order to figure out if Xen is stuck or just slow in the automated tests. Signed-off-by: Roger Pau Monné --- automation/scripts/qemu-smoke-x86-64.sh | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/2] automation: improve tests

2019-12-03 Thread Roger Pau Monne
Hello, Small series to improve the automated tests, first patch enables Xen console timestamps and the second one increases the test timeout to 30s since the clang PVH tests already takes ~10s without taking into account the time to initialize QEMU. Thanks, Roger. Roger Pau Monne (2):

[Xen-devel] [PATCH 2/2] automation: increase tests maximum time from 10s to 30s

2019-12-03 Thread Roger Pau Monne
10s is too low for the clang tests, this is the output from a clang test: (XEN) [6.512748] *** (XEN) [6.513323] SELFTEST FAILURE: CORRECT BEHAVIOR CANNOT BE GUARANTEED (XEN) [6.513891] ***

[Xen-devel] [xen-4.11-testing test] 144496: regressions - FAIL

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144496 xen-4.11-testing real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144496/ Regressions :-( Tests which did not succeed and are blocking, including tests which could not be run: build-amd64-prev 6 xen-buildfail REGR. vs. 144376

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86/AMD: unbreak CPU hotplug on AMD systems without RstrFpErrPtrs

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 29.11.2019 21:01, Igor Druzhinin wrote: > --- a/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c > +++ b/xen/arch/x86/cpu/common.c > @@ -54,7 +54,7 @@ static unsigned int forced_caps[NCAPINTS]; > > DEFINE_PER_CPU(bool, full_gdt_loaded); > > -void __init setup_clear_cpu_cap(unsigned int cap) > +void

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] x86: re-order clang no integrated assembler tests

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.12.2019 12:29, Roger Pau Monne wrote: > The tests to check whether the integrated assembler is capable of > building Xen should be performed before testing any assembler > features, or else the feature specific tests would be stale if the > integrated assembler is disabled afterwards. > >

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v3 1/2] xen/xenbus: reference count registered modules

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.12.2019 12:41, Paul Durrant wrote: > To prevent a PV driver module being removed whilst attached to its other > end, and hence xenbus calling into potentially invalid text, take a > reference on the module before calling the probe() method (dropping it if > unsuccessful) and drop the

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH livepatch-build-tools] create-diff-object: Include string sections later

2019-12-03 Thread Sergey Dyasli
On 03/12/2019 07:57, Pawel Wieczorkiewicz wrote: > ... when all symbols have their status and include flags processed. > > Processing special sections may include additional symbols. String > sections (.rodata*) are included iff they are referenced by at least > one symbol. Thus, in order to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2] x86 / iommu: set up a scratch page in the quarantine domain

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 28.11.2019 12:32, Jürgen Groß wrote: > On 28.11.19 12:17, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 27.11.2019 18:11, Paul Durrant wrote: >>> This patch introduces a new iommu_op to facilitate a per-implementation >>> quarantine set up, and then further code for x86 implementations >>> (amd and vtd) to set up a

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.13] clang: do not enable live-patching support

2019-12-03 Thread George Dunlap
> On Dec 2, 2019, at 5:01 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk > wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2019 at 03:55:04PM +, Andrew Cooper wrote: >> On 02/12/2019 15:53, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote: > I plan to release ack the patch in case the missing maintainer's acks > are not coming in too late.

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.14 and future work

2019-12-03 Thread Durrant, Paul
> -Original Message- > From: Xen-devel On Behalf Of > Andrew Cooper > Sent: 02 December 2019 19:52 > To: Xen-devel List > Subject: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.14 and future work > > Hello, > > Now that 4.13 is on its way out of the door, it is time to look to > ongoing work. > > We have a large

[Xen-devel] [xen-unstable test] 144497: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED

2019-12-03 Thread osstest service owner
flight 144497 xen-unstable real [real] http://logs.test-lab.xenproject.org/osstest/logs/144497/ Failures :-/ but no regressions. Tests which did not succeed, but are not blocking: test-amd64-amd64-xl-rtds 18 guest-localmigrate/x10 fail like 144484

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 2/2] x86/mm: Make use of the default access param from xc_altp2m_create_view

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.12.2019 13:39, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > On 29.11.2019 13:41, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 21.11.2019 16:02, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: >>> Changes since V2: >>> - Drop static from xenmem_access_to_p2m_access() and declare it >>> in mem_access.h >>> - Use

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH V3 1/2] x86/altp2m: Add hypercall to set a range of sve bits

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 02.12.2019 15:40, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: > On 29.11.2019 13:31, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 21.11.2019 16:02, Alexandru Stefan ISAILA wrote: >>> @@ -4711,6 +4712,18 @@ static int do_altp2m_op( >>> } >>> break; >>> >>> +case HVMOP_altp2m_set_suppress_ve_multi: >>>

Re: [Xen-devel] bug: unable to LZ4 decompress ub1910 installer kernel when launching domU

2019-12-03 Thread Jan Beulich
On 01.12.2019 18:47, Jeremi Piotrowski wrote: > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 10:12:19AM +0200, Jan Beulich wrote: >> On 23.10.2019 22:33, Pry Mar wrote: >>> Hello xen-devel, >>> >>> https://paste.debian.net/plain/1109374 >>> >>> shows my traces from a healthy CentOS 8, xen-4.12.1 dom0 when trying >>>