Hi Andrew,
On 12/06/2017 03:08 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 06/12/17 13:04, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Jan,
On 12/06/2017 12:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.17 at 12:47, wrote:
On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
I guess I have been CCed because you woul
On 06/12/17 13:04, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Jan,
>
> On 12/06/2017 12:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.12.17 at 12:47, wrote:
>>> On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>> On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
> I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is
> fixing t
Hi Jan,
On 12/06/2017 12:58 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.17 at 12:47, wrote:
On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is fixing the
regression you mentioned on IRC?
Yes, but first of all we need t
>>> On 06.12.17 at 12:47, wrote:
> On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
> On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
>>> I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is fixing the
>>> regression you mentioned on IRC?
>>
>> Yes, but first of all we need to see whether the issue goes awa
On 12/06/2017 11:45 AM, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is fixing the
regression you mentioned on IRC?
Yes, but first of all we need to see whether the issue goes away in
master once the patch is in.
Would revertin
>>> On 06.12.17 at 10:47, wrote:
> I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is fixing the
> regression you mentioned on IRC?
Yes, but first of all we need to see whether the issue goes away in
master once the patch is in.
Jan
___
X
Hi Jan,
I guess I have been CCed because you would like this patch is fixing the
regression you mentioned on IRC?
Cheers,
On 12/05/2017 04:13 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
vio->mmio_retry is being set when a repeated string insn is being split
up. In that case we'll exit to the guest, expecting imm
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 05 December 2017 17:19
> To: Paul Durrant
> Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper
> ; xen-devel de...@lists.xenproject.org>
> Subject: RE: [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't retain emulated insn cache when
> exiting back to guest
>>> On 05.12.17 at 17:44, wrote:
>> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
>> Sent: 05 December 2017 16:14
>> --- a/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> +++ b/xen/arch/x86/hvm/emulate.c
>> @@ -2109,20 +2109,22 @@ static int _hvm_emulate_one(struct hvm_e
>>
>> vio->mmio_retry = 0;
>>
>> -
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan Beulich [mailto:jbeul...@suse.com]
> Sent: 05 December 2017 16:14
> To: xen-devel
> Cc: Julien Grall ; Andrew Cooper
> ; Paul Durrant
> Subject: [PATCH] x86/HVM: don't retain emulated insn cache when exiting
> back to guest
>
> vio->mmio_retry is being se
vio->mmio_retry is being set when a repeated string insn is being split
up. In that case we'll exit to the guest, expecting immediate re-entry.
Interruptions, however, may be serviced by the guest before re-entry
from the repeated string insn. Any emulation needed in the course of
handling the inte
11 matches
Mail list logo
