Hi,
On 20/08/2019 14:12, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 19/08/2019 19:37, Julien Grall wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On 8/19/19 7:04 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 19/08/2019 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Commit b5e6e1ee8da "xen/console: Don't treat NUL character as the end
of the buffer" extended sercon_puts to
On 19/08/2019 19:37, Julien Grall wrote:
> Hi Andrew,
>
> On 8/19/19 7:04 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
>> On 19/08/2019 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
>>> Commit b5e6e1ee8da "xen/console: Don't treat NUL character as the end
>>> of the buffer" extended sercon_puts to take the number of character
>>> to
Hi Andrew,
On 8/19/19 7:04 PM, Andrew Cooper wrote:
On 19/08/2019 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
Commit b5e6e1ee8da "xen/console: Don't treat NUL character as the end
of the buffer" extended sercon_puts to take the number of character
to print in argument.
Sadly, a couple of couple of the callers
On 19/08/2019 19:01, Julien Grall wrote:
> Commit b5e6e1ee8da "xen/console: Don't treat NUL character as the end
> of the buffer" extended sercon_puts to take the number of character
> to print in argument.
>
> Sadly, a couple of couple of the callers in debugtrace_dump_worker()
> were not
Commit b5e6e1ee8da "xen/console: Don't treat NUL character as the end
of the buffer" extended sercon_puts to take the number of character
to print in argument.
Sadly, a couple of couple of the callers in debugtrace_dump_worker()
were not converted. This result to a build failure when enabling
