On 12/06/18 12:18, Jan Beulich wrote:
On 12.06.18 at 12:44, wrote:
On 06/06/18 11:06, Julien Grall wrote:
On 05/06/18 19:26, Lars Kurth wrote:
This change in behaviour was mistakenly introduced in one of the later
revisions (can't recall which), when we refactored the call to
>>> On 12.06.18 at 12:44, wrote:
> On 06/06/18 11:06, Julien Grall wrote:
>> On 05/06/18 19:26, Lars Kurth wrote:
>>> This change in behaviour was mistakenly introduced in one of the later
>>> revisions (can't recall which), when we refactored the call to
>>> get_maintainers.pl
>>
>> Thank
Julien Grall writes ("Re: [PATCH for-4.11] scripts/add_maintainers.pl: Don't
call get_maintainers.pl with -f"):
> On 06/06/18 11:06, Julien Grall wrote:
> > I will commit the patch once we branched.
>
> I was about to commit but I forgot that I would need a ack from someone
> in "THE REST".
>
Hi,
On 05/06/18 19:26, Lars Kurth wrote:
On 05/06/2018, 19:15, "Juergen Gross" wrote:
On 05/06/18 18:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> The option -f of scripts/get_maintainers.pl will return the maintainers
> of a given file, *not* the list of maintainers if the file was a patch.
On 05/06/2018, 19:15, "Juergen Gross" wrote:
On 05/06/18 18:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> The option -f of scripts/get_maintainers.pl will return the maintainers
> of a given file, *not* the list of maintainers if the file was a patch.
>
> The output expected of
On 05/06/18 18:39, Julien Grall wrote:
> The option -f of scripts/get_maintainers.pl will return the maintainers
> of a given file, *not* the list of maintainers if the file was a patch.
>
> The output expected of add_maintainers is the latter, so drop the option
> -f.
>
> Signed-off-by: Julien
The option -f of scripts/get_maintainers.pl will return the maintainers
of a given file, *not* the list of maintainers if the file was a patch.
The output expected of add_maintainers is the latter, so drop the option
-f.
Signed-off-by: Julien Grall
---
This patch is candidate for Xen 4.11.
