Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/multicall: Use the common hcall_preempted boolean

2017-02-16 Thread Julien Grall 

Hi Andrew,

On 15/02/17 19:41, Andrew Cooper wrote:

The now-common hcall_preempted boolean is perfectly usable for multicalls.
Remove the multicall-specific preemption mechanism.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Cooper 


For the ARM bits:

Reviewed-by: Julien Grall 

Cheers,

--
Julien Grall

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/multicall: Use the common hcall_preempted boolean

2017-02-16 Thread Andrew Cooper 
On 16/02/17 10:37, Jan Beulich wrote:
 On 15.02.17 at 20:41,  wrote:
>> The now-common hcall_preempted boolean is perfectly usable for multicalls.
> Something must have gone in the wrong order here: This is not part
> of a series, and I can't see hcall_preempted being common in
> staging.

Sorry.  I fumbled `git format-patch` and omitted the patch numbers.

The correct order of the series is:

Andrew Cooper (7):
  x86/hypercall: Make the HVM hcall_preempted boolean common
  arm/hypercall: Use the common hcall_preempted boolean
  xen/multicall: Use the common hcall_preempted boolean
  x86/hypercall: Make the HVM hcall_64bit boolean common
  x86/hypercall: Split out PV hypercall infrastructure
  x86/hypercall: Move hypercall continuation logic
  [RFC] x86/kconfig: Introduce CONFIG_PV and CONFIG_HVM

~Andrew

___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xen/multicall: Use the common hcall_preempted boolean

2017-02-16 Thread Jan Beulich 
>>> On 15.02.17 at 20:41,  wrote:
> The now-common hcall_preempted boolean is perfectly usable for multicalls.

Something must have gone in the wrong order here: This is not part
of a series, and I can't see hcall_preempted being common in
staging.

Jan


___
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@lists.xen.org
https://lists.xen.org/xen-devel