Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]

2016-10-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Wei Liu writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]"): > FAOD, I consider this sub-thread for "what should we do for stable > versions of Xen". This is orthogonal to whether we should upgrade our > in-tree ipxe version. In other words, I plan to

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]

2016-10-12 Thread Wei Liu
On Wed, Oct 12, 2016 at 12:00:56PM +0100, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer > commit"): > > That was eventually done. I'm not sure exactly when the change was > > made. Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ?

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]

2016-10-12 Thread Boris Ostrovsky
On 10/12/2016 07:00 AM, Ian Jackson wrote: > Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer > commit"): >> That was eventually done. I'm not sure exactly when the change was >> made. Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ? > Jan Beulich

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit [and 1 more messages]

2016-10-12 Thread Ian Jackson
Ian Jackson writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update to newer commit"): > That was eventually done. I'm not sure exactly when the change was > made. Does gcc -Wno-foo work properly on all the gcc's we care about ? Jan Beulich writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH for-4.8] ipxe: update