Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [Patch] Fix typo. (PALL - PAL)

2008-11-16 Thread Isaku Yamahata
applied, thanks.

On Fri, Nov 14, 2008 at 03:55:50PM +0900, Akio Takebe wrote:
Content-Description: Mail message body
 Hi,
 
 Fix typo. (PALL - PAL)
 
 Signed-off-by: Akio Takebe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 Best Regards,
 
 Akio Takebe

 ___
 Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
 Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

-- 
yamahata

___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


[Xen-ia64-devel] [Test Report] Weekly Xen-IPF Test Report ------ 2008-11-14

2008-11-16 Thread Zhang, Jingke
Hi all,
No new Csets for IPF last week. Latest Cset#18763 is stable. 

We also did some stress test for VTI with Cset#18633. Result is good! Next 
stress, we will choose the last three cases running for 24 hours each. 
=
Platform: Tiger4 
VTI Configuration: UP, 512M 
[PASS] Xen crashme stress, 8 hours 
[PASS] Xen helltest stress, 8 hours 
[PASS] Xen cvworkloads stress, 8 hours 
[PASS] Xen ltp stress, 8 hours 
[PASS] Xen kernelbuild stress, 8 hours 
[PASS] Run crashme,helltest,cvworkload ltp kernelbuild serially for 20 
hours 
[PASS] Run crashme helltest cvworkload ltp kernelbuild parallely for 20 
hours 
[PASS] Xen stress for win2k8, 8 hours 

Current unfixed issues (total 3):
=
1. with IRQBALANCE service start, dom0 will crash on RHEL5u2 
2. Dom0 and Win2k3_VTI with e1000 can not ping each other 
3. When all the vcpus are taken by Dom0, SMP_VTI booting speed is very slow 
during NVRAM loading period.



Thanks,
Zhang Jingke


___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


[Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.

2008-11-16 Thread Zhang, Xiantao
Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.

Signed-off-by : Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]

diff -r 9bc00e9716cd xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S
--- a/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S   Fri Nov 07 19:34:59 2008 +0900
+++ b/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S   Mon Nov 17 11:12:58 2008 +0800
@@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ vmx_alt_itlb_miss_vmm:
 movl r19=(((1  IA64_MAX_PHYS_BITS) - 1)  ~0xfff)
 ;;
 and r19=r19,r16 // clear ed, reserved bits, and PTE control bits
-extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 15// extract UC bit
+extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 1// extract UC bit
 ;;
 or r19=r17,r19  // insert PTE control bits into r19
 mov r20=IA64_GRANULE_SHIFT2

Fix-XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT-use.patch
Description: Fix-XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT-use.patch
___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

Re: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.

2008-11-16 Thread Isaku Yamahata
Hi. This patch itself looks okay.

Just for confirming. This patch doesn't affect the
result because the following line sees only the lsb 0 bit
of r18. Correct?

extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 15// extract UC bit
...
dep r19=r18,r19,4,1 // set bit 4 (uncached) if the access was to UC region


On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:20:49AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
 Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.
 
 Signed-off-by : Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 diff -r 9bc00e9716cd xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S
 --- a/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S Fri Nov 07 19:34:59 2008 +0900
 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S Mon Nov 17 11:12:58 2008 +0800
 @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ vmx_alt_itlb_miss_vmm:
  movl r19=(((1  IA64_MAX_PHYS_BITS) - 1)  ~0xfff)
  ;;
  and r19=r19,r16 // clear ed, reserved bits, and PTE control bits
 -extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 15// extract UC bit
 +extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 1// extract UC bit
  ;;
  or r19=r17,r19  // insert PTE control bits into r19
  mov r20=IA64_GRANULE_SHIFT2

 ___
 Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
 Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel

-- 
yamahata

___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


RE: [Xen-ia64-devel] [PATCH] Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.

2008-11-16 Thread Zhang, Xiantao
Yes, only bit 0 is used for dep. 
Xiantao

Isaku Yamahata wrote:
 Hi. This patch itself looks okay.
 
 Just for confirming. This patch doesn't affect the
 result because the following line sees only the lsb 0 bit
 of r18. Correct?
 
 extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 15// extract UC bit
 ...
 dep r19=r18,r19,4,1 // set bit 4 (uncached) if the access was to
 UC region 
 
 
 On Mon, Nov 17, 2008 at 11:20:49AM +0800, Zhang, Xiantao wrote:
 Fix a bug for XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT use.
 
 Signed-off-by : Zhang Xiantao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 
 diff -r 9bc00e9716cd xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.S
 --- a/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.SFri Nov 07 19:34:59 2008 +0900
 +++ b/xen/arch/ia64/vmx/vmx_ivt.SMon Nov 17 11:12:58 2008 +0800
 @@ -314,7 +314,7 @@ vmx_alt_itlb_miss_vmm:
  movl r19=(((1  IA64_MAX_PHYS_BITS) - 1)  ~0xfff)  ;;
  and r19=r19,r16 // clear ed, reserved bits, and PTE control
 bits -extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 15// extract UC bit
 +extr.u r18=r16,XEN_VIRT_UC_BIT, 1// extract UC bit  ;;
  or r19=r17,r19  // insert PTE control bits into r19
  mov r20=IA64_GRANULE_SHIFT2
 
 ___
 Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
 Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
 http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel


___
Xen-ia64-devel mailing list
Xen-ia64-devel@lists.xensource.com
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-ia64-devel