Re: [XenPPC] Xen on System p - possible

2007-03-15 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 12:37 +0800, Richard Chan wrote: > Is Xen possible on System p? > > For me, even the lite-version of IBM's System pofferings (IVM) is > expensive,not to mention HMC, so hoping for a para-virt solution. Unfortunately this is not currently possible. The biggest issue for us is

[XenPPC] Xen on System p - possible

2007-03-15 Thread Richard Chan
Is Xen possible on System p? For me, even the lite-version of IBM's System pofferings (IVM) is expensive,not to mention HMC, so hoping for a para-virt solution. Tks. Richard ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list Xen-ppc-devel@lists.xensource.com http://lists

Re: [XenPPC] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable

2007-03-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hollis Blanchard wrote: > I can't just ifdef PowerPC's xc_linux_build back in, because libelf > doesn't map page-by-page like the old ELF loader did. That means I need > to pre-map the memory, which starts dragging in xc_dom infrastructure. You don't need more xc_dom infrastructure, I've tried to

Re: [XenPPC] Profiling in xen – ppc consi derations

2007-03-15 Thread Christian Ehrhardt
Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Mar 14, 2007, at 6:17 AM, Christian Ehrhardt wrote: Jimi Xenidis wrote: Christian, nice summary. One question I have is does Xen allow the domain to extract domain oprofile information as linxu would without Xen, or does xen allow for some transport that eases the col