[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

2006-11-10 Thread Keir Fraser
On 10/11/06 5:49 am, "Isaku Yamahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > fix xenmem hypercall for non-trivial xencomm arch(i.e. ia64, and powerpc) > On ia64 and powerpc, guest_handle_add_offset() effect persists over > hypercall continuation because its consumed offset is recorced in > guest domains mem

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

2006-11-10 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 08:03:51AM +, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 10/11/06 5:49 am, "Isaku Yamahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > fix xenmem hypercall for non-trivial xencomm arch(i.e. ia64, and powerpc) > > On ia64 and powerpc, guest_handle_add_offset() effect persists over > > hypercall cont

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

2006-11-10 Thread Keir Fraser
On 10/11/06 08:45, "Isaku Yamahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > - introduce guest_handle_add_offset_after_continuatiton() and > replace guest_handle_add_offset() in memory.c with it. > leave do_multicall() and guest_console_write() as is. This is the best option I think. But I'm loathe to ma

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

2006-11-10 Thread Isaku Yamahata
On Fri, Nov 10, 2006 at 09:57:44AM +, Keir Fraser wrote: > On 10/11/06 08:45, "Isaku Yamahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > - introduce guest_handle_add_offset_after_continuatiton() and > > replace guest_handle_add_offset() in memory.c with it. > > leave do_multicall() and guest_consol

[XenPPC] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] xencomm, xenmem and hypercall continuation

2006-11-10 Thread Keir Fraser
On 10/11/06 10:42, "Isaku Yamahata" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This is the best option I think. But I'm loathe to make it part of the >> guest_handle API. We should avoid getting into this mess in the first place >> for future hypercalls, so this will be a memory-specific function. >> >> We sh

Re: [XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN][POWERPC] Use a bitmap to manage the foreign page area

2006-11-10 Thread Jimi Xenidis
Thanks for the watchful eye On Nov 9, 2006, at 4:49 PM, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote: On Thu, Nov 09, 2006 at 12:02:45AM +, Xen patchbot-linux- ppc-2.6 wrote: +struct page *alloc_foreign_page(void) +{ + int bit; + do { + bit = find_first_zero_bit(foreign_map_bitmap, +

Re: [XenPPC] xm save/restore tests

2006-11-10 Thread Jimi Xenidis
Thanks Yi, On Nov 9, 2006, at 5:22 PM, geyi wrote: Jimi, We made several tests on the save/restore with different guest domain configuration. Here is the problems we meet in the tests: 1. Cannot get the pfn list on large domain (domain memory >= 1GB). The xc_get_pfn_list will fail for la

Re: [XenPPC] xm save/restore tests

2006-11-10 Thread geyi
Jimi Xenidis wrote: Thanks Yi, On Nov 9, 2006, at 5:22 PM, geyi wrote: Jimi, We made several tests on the save/restore with different guest domain configuration. Here is the problems we meet in the tests: 1. Cannot get the pfn list on large domain (domain memory >= 1GB). The xc_get_pfn_li

Re: [XenPPC] Problem in running on 970 simulator

2006-11-10 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Wed, 2006-11-08 at 05:53 +, 장현승 wrote: > I am using 970 Simulator for testing PPC Xen but I found that PPC Xen did not > work on 970 simulator from rev 11963. > > It hangs after domain 0 is initialized and before shell prompt comes. > > > > By some tracing, I found that there is no hyp

Re: [XenPPC] Problem in running on 970 simulator

2006-11-10 Thread Mark F Mergen
I don't know how to find what rev I have.  I built Mambo for gpul from the Austin trees as of August 14 and I successfully run the very latest Xen and Linux on this simulator, both with and without my patches for noHV. Mark___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list

[XenPPC] [PATCH] non-x86 build fix for libfsimage

2006-11-10 Thread Alex Williamson
IA64 & PPC aren't making use of this right now, but it's silly to have the build fail for some trivial x86 specific assembly. I snagged the appropriate bitops for ia64 and ppc (untested) and tossed in an unoptimized option as well in case we want to make use of it. Thanks, Alex Signe

[XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN] up the XEN_DOMCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION to 4

2006-11-10 Thread Xen patchbot-linux-ppc-2 . 6
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Node ID 7553b5170236ffe6ed3805c321bfd1ce2010793e # Parent e6688f786b21d74a4616a56415d2b11562d7fcc0 [XEN] up the XEN_DOMCTL_INTERFACE_VERSION to 4 Signed-off-by: Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --- include/xen/interface/domctl.h |

[XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN][POWERPC] Fixes int he bitmap managment of the Foriegn Map

2006-11-10 Thread Xen patchbot-linux-ppc-2 . 6
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Node ID ef51ca28a1fc1e49299f0492194f921a309abc64 # Parent 7553b5170236ffe6ed3805c321bfd1ce2010793e [XEN][POWERPC] Fixes int he bitmap managment of the Foriegn Map Bitmap bit position are ulongs, and more error checking. Thanks to: [EM

[XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [XEN] file is removed upstream

2006-11-10 Thread Xen patchbot-linux-ppc-2 . 6
# HG changeset patch # User Jimi Xenidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> # Node ID e6688f786b21d74a4616a56415d2b11562d7fcc0 # Parent 15c1ca41a412014e942f72c908861c963a35e306 [XEN] file is removed upstream --- drivers/xen/netfront/Kconfig |6 -- 1 files changed, 6 deletions(-) diff -r 15c1ca41a412 -r