Re: [XenPPC] Help with JS21 disk solution

2006-09-26 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:44 AM, Jimi Xenidis wrote: On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ static void u4_inv_entry(ulong pgn) union dart_ctl dc; ulong retries = 0; +return u4_inv_all(); If you need inv_all here, you have a bug elsewhere...

Re: [XenPPC] Help with JS21 disk solution

2006-09-26 Thread Jimi Xenidis
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote: @@ -126,6 +126,8 @@ static void u4_inv_entry(ulong pgn) union dart_ctl dc; ulong retries = 0; +return u4_inv_all(); If you need inv_all here, you have a bug elsewhere... I agree, I'm just trying to corner the beast :) -JX

[XenPPC] Re: xencomm porting and inline handles

2006-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Mardi 12 Septembre 2006 20:37, Hollis Blanchard a écrit : Hi Tristan, I've just implemented your inline handle idea. The Xen changes are committed to xenppc-unstable.hg . In Xen, architectures need to provide: - XENCOMM_INLINE_FLAG in arch-foo.h - paddr_to_maddr(). I'm open to alternative

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [XenPPC] [RFC][PATCH] Isolating ACM's architecture-dependent parts

2006-09-26 Thread Tristan Gingold
Le Mardi 26 Septembre 2006 13:56, Stefan Berger a écrit : Tristan Gingold [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 09/26/2006 07:54:27 [...] Hi, sorry for the late reply, I am just back from holidays. It seems you patch has not yet been merged. Is there any reason ? I'd like to see it in the