[XenPPC] Re: [PATCH][TOOLS][XM-TEST] Force BR_URL decison into final Makefile.

2006-10-26 Thread Ewan Mellor
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 03:22:13PM +1000, Tony Breeds wrote: Hello Ewan, I was testing out the current xen-unstable on x86 and found that with automake 1.9 I needed the floowing patch to have the generated Makefile work. Otherwise I was getting variations on BR_URL =

Re: [XenPPC] Re: 2 questions of creating domU

2006-10-26 Thread Tony Breeds
On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 10:38:46AM -0400, Jimi Xenidis wrote: this just works in my local disk environment and I'm pretty sure othe local disk environments work as well. Hollis, Tony are you able to create domain that have net access? Yes. On my JS20 I was able to create a domU (called

Re: [XenPPC] Re: 2 questions of creating domU

2006-10-26 Thread Tony Breeds
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 02:11:54AM -0400, Hao Yu wrote: Hi Tony, Thanks for the info. I followed your steps and basically got the same thing: Hi Hao, You're up late (or early). 1. I got rid of the line : vif = [ '' ] , created a domain (id=8) 2. I issued xm network-attach 8,

Re: [XenPPC] Re: 2 questions of creating domU

2006-10-26 Thread Hao Yu
Thanks Tony, I shall go to bed soon. Here are the info you asked. (See attached file: 2006-10-26-domU-dmesg.out)(See attached file: xenstore-ls.out) Regards, Hao Hao Yu Commercial Scale Out IBM T.J. Watson Research Center 1101 Kitchawan Rd/Route 134, Rm 36-019 Yorktown Heights, NY 10598-0218

Re: [XenPPC] [linux-ppc-2.6] [LINUX][XEN][POWEPRC] def config changes

2006-10-26 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Why did you change the date? Jimi did not change the date by hand. The Kconfig logic discussed above did so, and I believe that the myriad benefits of that logic outweigh the cost of resolving the trivial merge conflict caused by the date. Perhaps we can investigate removing the date

Re: [XenPPC] [PATCH] Remove timestamp from xen_maple_defconfig

2006-10-26 Thread Segher Boessenkool
Doesn't this require that everybody build like this all the time? In that case, I'm not sure a one-time checkin makes sense. Yes. You can edit your Makefile's to always include it, if you want. Segher ___ Xen-ppc-devel mailing list

[XenPPC] [PATCH] SMP and IPI support

2006-10-26 Thread Amos Waterland
Enable SMP and IPI support, including remote function invocation. There are a number of subtle issues fixed in this patch. I believe it is a candidate for merging. I have tested this extensively on JS21 and model 884221X JS20 blades, and to a degree on Maple. I would appreciate further testing

[XenPPC] Backtace on single processor blade

2006-10-26 Thread Amos Waterland
We have a particular JS20 blade, named kpblade11, on which we have to flash a downlevel SLOF, and on which when Linux runs it reports only one CPU. Current tip of tree Xen/PPC appears to find the missing processor in some capacity, as the following is printed during boot. Note that this is