Le Mardi 26 Septembre 2006 20:23, Hollis Blanchard a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:04 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
After more work, inline xencomm is not that magic: it doesn't work for
modules which are loaded in virtual memory. So I have to use mini
xencomm at least for modules.
If you need inv_all here, you have a bug elsewhere...
I agree, I'm just trying to corner the beast :)
Ok, this seems to work, its pretty solid, so somehow our
invalidation logic is sufficient for network but not disk
activity. One theory is that disk uses short lived TCE entries and
On Sep 27, 2006, at 8:37 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
If you need inv_all here, you have a bug elsewhere...
I agree, I'm just trying to corner the beast :)
Ok, this seems to work, its pretty solid, so somehow our
invalidation logic is sufficient for network but not disk
activity. One
On Wed, 2006-09-27 at 08:19 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
Le Mardi 26 Septembre 2006 20:23, Hollis Blanchard a écrit :
On Tue, 2006-09-26 at 10:04 +0200, Tristan Gingold wrote:
After more work, inline xencomm is not that magic: it doesn't work for
modules which are loaded in virtual
