Re: [XenPPC] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable

2007-03-15 Thread Gerd Hoffmann
Hollis Blanchard wrote: I can't just ifdef PowerPC's xc_linux_build back in, because libelf doesn't map page-by-page like the old ELF loader did. That means I need to pre-map the memory, which starts dragging in xc_dom infrastructure. You don't need more xc_dom infrastructure, I've tried to

Re: [XenPPC] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable

2007-03-09 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 08:27 +, Keir Fraser wrote: The new domain builder infrastructure is not flexible enough for PowerPC, so we're sticking with our own xc_linux_build(). It sounded before like that would be possible, so I assume a20ec270998b was just an oversight? Hmm yes. You

Re: [XenPPC] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable

2007-03-07 Thread Brendan Cully
On Tuesday, 06 March 2007 at 14:56, Hollis Blanchard wrote: On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 17:08 +, Keir Fraser wrote: xc_linux_build() is still provided in the 'new world' and is still used by xend. For ia64/x86 it is now a thin wrapper around Gerd's new domain-building infrastructure. For ppc

Re: [XenPPC] Re: New domain builder in xen-unstable

2007-03-06 Thread Hollis Blanchard
On Fri, 2007-01-26 at 17:08 +, Keir Fraser wrote: xc_linux_build() is still provided in the 'new world' and is still used by xend. For ia64/x86 it is now a thin wrapper around Gerd's new domain-building infrastructure. For ppc you can continue to have your very own version under