[Fedora-xen] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-06-30 Thread Travis
Hi guys, I'm an administrator for a small cluster running ganeti2.3.1/xen4.1.0/drbd83 on centos5.6, with predominantly fedora14 instances. We've been running the fedora 14 images pretty well, not many issues. However, I've noticed that in an attempt to install fedora 15, the virtualized block devi

Re: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-06-30 Thread Travis
nrad Rzeszutek Wilk < konrad.w...@oracle.com> wrote: > On Thu, Jun 30, 2011 at 02:45:42PM -0400, Travis wrote: > > Hi guys, > > > > I'm an administrator for a small cluster running > ganeti2.3.1/xen4.1.0/drbd83 > > on centos5.6, with predominantly fedora14 instanc

Re: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-07-01 Thread Travis
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Travis wrote: > > I'm using HVM, and I've attached screenshots from the requested output > > (+lspci). No other OS is giving me this problem, and > i'm consistently able

Re: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-07-01 Thread Travis
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 05:15 +0100, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > > > > Second part, F15's boot/config-2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15.x86_64 has these > > entries: > > CONFIG_XEN_PLATFORM_PCI=m > > CONFIG_XEN_BLKDEV_FRONTEND=m > > > > So if you could add xen-

Re: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-07-02 Thread Travis
On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Travis wrote: > > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: > >> On Sat, 2011-07-02 at 05:15 +0100, Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: >> > >> > Second part, F15's boot/config-2.6.38.6-26.rc1.fc15.x86_64 has these >

Re: [Fedora-xen] [Xen-devel] Xen4.1.0 and Fedora15 Block device bug?

2011-07-05 Thread Travis
On Jul 5, 2011 9:53 AM, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 02, 2011 at 03:05:59AM -0400, Travis wrote: > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:07 AM, Travis wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 2:02 AM, Ian Campbell wrote: